Skip to content

Woodbridge, ON · Charitable organization

Woodbridge United Church

A christian church in woodbridge ontario holding regular weekly worship services visiting ill and elderly members of the congregation raising funds to support other local and international charities providing facilities for other christian groups and community organizations

C$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$252k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADAC$9,724
VAUGHAN FOOD BANKC$2,000
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA-HEALING FUNDC$1,700
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$155k · 7 repeat orgsC$8k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

C$155k
C$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+30%

Still filing today

71%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$126k · revenue +22%
  • VF
    VAUGHAN FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +380%
  • HV
    HOSPICE VAUGHAN
    3× · 2019–2021 · C$3k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CR
    CANADIAN RED CROSS-UKRAINE HUMANITARIAN
    one grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue -47%
  • TL
    THE LEPROSY MISSION
    one grant, 2020 · C$1k
  • FV
    FRED VICTOR MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue +135%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cooperation Canada - Coopération Canada

Cooperation Canada is Canada's national association of international development and humanitarian organizations. Cooperation Canada brings together and advocates for effective Canadian international development assistance by convening…

—
2
World Vision Canada-Vision Mondiale Canada

World Vision Canada carries out programs in 55 countries which are funded through ongoing private and public funding and focuses on: • Livelihoods: including food environment & climate change and economic empowerment; • Health: including…

—
3
International Development Research Centre

Created by Parliament in 1970 IDRC has been committed in supporting research in developing countries undertaken by the people of those countries for their own development. IDRC has five areas of focus: Climate-Resilient Food Systems Global…

—
4
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
5
Islamic Relief - Ir Canada

Islamic Relief Canada carries out humanitarian and development programs in over 30 countries. Programs include: • Livelihoods focused on climate-adaptive support and/or economic empowerment; • Health including water sanitation and hygiene…

—
6
Volunteer Canada - Benevoles Canada

Volunteer canada provides national leadership promoting volunteerism in canada. the organization supports volunteerism and civic participation through ongoing program resource development training and national initiatives. volunteer canada…

—
7
Pih Partners in Health Canada

Partners In Health Canada works in partnership with sister organizations in settings of poverty around the world to bring health and social justice to vulnerable and marginalized communities. We deliver high quality comprehensive health…

—
8
Humanitarian Coalition /

The Humanitarian Coalition contributes towards alleviating acute human suffering among survivors of humanitarian disasters. As a joint Canadian approach to humanitarian response the Humanitarian Coalition is a 'one-stop-shop' for all…

—
9
Amref Health Africa in Canada

Amref health africa in canada ensures access to good health for the most vulnerable and marginalized people in africa. with their active involvement we develop and implement innovative and sustainable solutions to critical health…

—
10
Interagency Coalition On Aids and Development- Coalition Interagence Sida Et Developpement

Southern African Nutrition Initiative Canadian HIV/AIDS Black African and Caribbean (CHABAC) Network Strengthen Canada’s response to TB and HIV.

—
11
Cuso International

Cuso International is a Canadian not-for-profit international cooperation and development organization that works to create economic and social opportunities for marginalized groups in Africa Latin America the Caribbean and Canada.…

—
12
Oxfam Canada

Oxfam canada this year spanned 21 countries focusing on various humanitarian and development initiatives. in jamaica we address gender-based violence (gbv) through social norm changes and advocacy. in nicaragua we empower civil society for…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sim Canada and the most unlike its peers is The Leprosy Mission Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA — C$126,305 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVAUGHAN FOOD BANK — C$16,022 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetHOSPICE VAUGHAN — C$3,257 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS-UKRAINE HUMANITARIAN — C$3,130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSEY CENTRE — C$2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEPROSY MISSION — C$2,465 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRED VICTOR MISSION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIM CANDADA — C$790 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds VAUGHAN FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE VAUGHAN ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS-UKRAINE HUMANITARIAN ↗
  • Who funds MASSEY CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds THE LEPROSY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FRED VICTOR MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SIM CANDADA ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 130355837:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Woodbridge United Church’s filings →