Woodstock, ON · Public foundation
Women's Executive Network Foundation
The foundation raises funds to distribute to charitable or other non-profit organizations with a focus on women's charitable organizations.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY | C$5,000 |
| ARCTIC ROSE FOUNDATION | C$2,500 |
| REDEFIN'D | C$1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 60% of grant dollars (C$68k). The 40% that went abroad (C$46k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 40% of all-years giving (C$46k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +172% since the first grant, against +69% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CWCanadian Women's Foundation2× · 2018–2019 · C$15k · revenue +172%
- SASOUTHERN ALBERTA INSTISTUTE OF TECH2× · 2018–2019 · C$10k · revenue +32%
- SFSIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY2× · 2018–2020 · C$10k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- GIGirls Incorporated of Durhamone grant, 2017 · C$10k
- RURyerson Universityone grant, 2017 · C$5k
- WLWilfrid Laurier Universityone grant, 2017 · C$5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…
Brain canada is a national non-profit organization that enables and supports excellent innovative paradigm-changine brain research in canada. it plays a unique and invaluable role as the national convener of the brain research community.…
CIFAR’s research programs are at the heart of its operations designed to push the boundaries of knowledge and create long-term societal impact. Currently CIFAR supports 15 research programs across diverse fields from artificial…
We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…
Mental Health Research Canada (MHRC) is a national charitable organization that is dedicated to improving the lives of all Canadians by advancing mental health knowledge. Our vision is to create a Canada with better mental health for all…
We deepen public understanding of a selection of intellectual topics in sport and educate the public about them.
The Calgary Foundation carried out its charitable purpose through the ongoing administration of its granting programs. While the Foundation provides grants to support charitable activity across the entire sector it has a particular focus…
LEAP Pecaut Centre for Social Impact initiates and leads multi-sector collaborations to tackle some of society’s biggest problems in education employment and health. Over five years taking their needs and stages of development into…
Ccdf works to strengthen the field of career development through evidence-based research competency-based training of career practitioners/educators the development of innovative new approaches to service delivery and the promotion of…
Funding for grants is provided to the Stollery Children's Hospital the University of Alberta the Women and Children's Health Research Institute the Mental Health Foundation and Alberta Health Services for research and education equipment…
United Nations Association in Canada engages citizens and decision makers at every level of Canadian society. It invests across generations bringing empathy-based educational resources and opportunities on health citizen education…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Women's Foundation / Fondation Canadienne Des Femmes and the most unlike its peers is Refood Food Rescue Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Canadian Women's Foundation ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN ALBERTA INSTISTUTE OF TECH ↗
- Who funds SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Toronto - Office of Advance ↗
- Who funds Wilfred Laurier University ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSTY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARCTIC ROSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REDEFIN'D ↗
- Who funds DIXON ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ACTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA RUE DES FEMMES ↗
- Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL CANADA INC ↗
- Who funds OLYMPIQUES SPECIAUX QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds Montreal Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Canadian Cancer Society ↗
- Who funds FONDATION CHU SAITNE-JUSTINE ↗
- Who funds The Salvation Army ↗
- Who funds VETS CANADA ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITHOUT SHELTER ↗
- Who funds ALS SOCIETY OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds The Stop Community Food Centre ↗
- Who funds NEWCOMER WOMEN'S SERVICES TORONTO ↗
- Who funds CALGARY YOUTH JUSTICE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Mackenzie Health Hospital ↗
- Who funds Toronto Public Library Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Calgary Foundation · Atco Electric Epic · United Way of Calgary and Area · United Way of the Alberta Capital Region · United Way British Columbia · Aqueduct Foundation · Atco Gas Employees' Community Service Fund · Canadian Women's Foundation / Fondation Canadienne Des Femmes · Vancouver Foundation · Youth and Philanthropy Initiative Canada/ Initiative Canada Jeunesse Et Philanthropie · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · The Canadian Red Cross Society / la Societe Canadienne de la Croix-Rouge
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.