Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization

Winnipeg Mennonite Elementary Schools Inc.

Wmes inc.

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$785
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$423
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TERRY FOX FOUNDATIONC$785
SILOAM MISSION INC.C$423
COMPASSION CANADAC$361
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$19k · 4 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

C$19k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$361 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Mennonite Central Committee
    4× · 2017–2023 · C$10k · revenue +53%
  • TT
    The Terry Fox Foundation
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue +39%
  • SM
    Siloam Mission Inc.
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$2k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • MM
    MCC Manitoba
    one grant, 2020 · C$3k
  • CM
    CANCERCARE MANITOBA
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +17%
  • TT
    The Terry Fox Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · C$756

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Manitoba Inc.

Rmhc manitoba supports the health and well-being of children by providing a 'home-away-from-home' and other essential servicces for critically ill chronically ill and seriously injured children and their families

—
2
The University of Manitoba

The University of Manitoba provides post-secondary education to undergraduate graduate and professional students. The University also conducts research in a broad array of academic disciplines. There are numerous educational and research…

—
3
The University of Winnipeg Foundation Inc.

The foundation receives donations from annual giving programs and other campaigns. Funds are gifted to the University of Winnipeg for education purposes (scholarships/bursaries) and for capital and capademic enhancement purposes.

—
4
The Lung Association Manitoba Inc.

The Manitoba Lung Association’s mission is to improve lung health of all Manitobans and Canadians. We - Provide tobacco reduction and smoking prevention and cessation programs.- Provide public education information and support to…

—
5
Grace General Hospital (Winnipeg) Foundation Inc

The grace hospital foundation supports staff and patient care enhancement that would not otherwise be funded by the government and helps assure that every patient who comes to the grace has access to the best care possible.

—
6
Manitoba Food Charter Inc.

To work with people in manitoba to increase opportunities for people to eat good food

—
7
Manitoba Hospice Foundation Inc./

Operates as palliative care manitoba and provides development of hospice palliative care for people of manitoba.

—
8
End Homelessness Winnipeg Inc.

To bring together all sectors of our community to work with people who are experiencing homelessness so that together we can prevent homelessness support recovery and wellbeing find suitable housing and measure our success in ways that…

—
9
Manitoba Habitat Heritage Corporation

Manitoba habitat conservancy (mhc) is manitoba's leading habitat and wildlife-focused charity directly implementing voluntary long-term conservation through perpetual conservation agreements and habitat improvement through restoration and…

—
10
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority

1) medical surgical and psychiatric healthcare. 2) medical research

—
11
Winnipeg Habitat for Humanity Inc.

Mobilizing volunteers and community partners Winnipeg Habitat for Humanity works with people from all walks of life to build safe and affordable housing for purchase by low-income working families.

—
12
Manitoba Realtors Shelter Foundation Inc.

Providing support for Manitoba based shelter related charities by making donations to qualified donees who are: (a) engaged in the research of shelter related topics and the development and supply of homes and transitional shelter; (b)…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancercare Manitoba Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is The Terry Fox Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMennonite Central Committee — C$9,806 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Terry Fox Foundation — C$5,395 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSiloam Mission Inc. — C$2,325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANCERCARE MANITOBA FOUNDATION — C$1,587 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCERCARE MANITOBA — C$1,046 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINNIPEG FOUNDATION — C$623 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST MANITOBA INC — C$538 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION CANADA — C$361 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSalvation Army — C$187 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE MISSION — C$70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE TABLE — C$55 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 108217043:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Winnipeg Mennonite Elementary Schools’ filings →