Windsor, NS · Charitable organization
Windsor Rotary Club Charity Fund
Operation of camp mockingee for various youth oragnizations; bursaries to high school students; junior achievement programming; citizenship awards to school students; senior's life line; school breakfast programs; food bank fundraising including food drive; operating grants to seniors bus and other community organizations.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY | C$1,500 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | C$500 |
| DIABETES CANADA | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LELandmark East3× · 2018–2020 · C$30k · revenue -5%
- WSWINDSOR SENIIOR CITIZEN BUS SOCIETY3× · 2019–2021 · C$17k · revenue -39%
- CCCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY2× · 2022–2024 · C$7k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- SBSHELTER BOX CANADAone grant, 2022 · C$3k
- RFROTARY FOUNDATION OF CANADAone grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue -11%
- RIROTARY INTERNATIONALone grant, 2020 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Direct assistance to persons afflicted by als. funding of research into disease
Fundraising programs provide funding for the enhancement of patient care research education and capital projects for London Health Sciences Centre.
Raise manage and distribute funds in support of our hospitals and cancer centre for patient care research education equipment renovations and capital expenditures.
The hants community hospital foundation carries on activies to raise funds to assist hants community hospital with capital purchases to provide the means to support community health care for the community of west hants.the foundation…
The foundation collects and administers funds on behalf of windsor regional hospital
The windsor foundation has two key areas of interest in the maritime provinces: support for programs projects and initiatives in the general community which provide services to or benefits for the disadvantaged or vulnerable and for those…
Maintains and operates the 'birthplace of hockey museum' in windsor nova scotia and promotes the town of windsor as the birthplace of hockey
The charity funded various health care research projects.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters Nova Scotia Foundation and the most unlike its peers is West Hants Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.