New Hamburg, ON · Charitable organization
Wilmot Horticultural Society
Junior gardeners plant at home project; planting watering weeding and mulching wilmot township's gardens; developing the tree canopy in the township of wilmot through 2 billion trees grant; education and encouragement of general horticulture in the township.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REGION OF WATERLOO LIBRARY 126301860RT0001 | C$300 |
| WATERLOO OXFORD DISTRICT SECONDARY SCHOOL | C$200 |
| NEW HAMBURG LIONS COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION (LIONESS DO | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NHNEW HAMBURG LIONESSES (NEW HAMBURG LIONS)6× · 2018–2024 · C$1k · revenue -33% · 85% of their budget
- ROREGION OF WATERLOO LIBRARY 126301860RT00012× · 2021–2024 · C$500
- ROREGION OF WATERLOO LIBRARY2× · 2020–2023 · C$500
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · C$2k
- OHONTARIO HORTICULTURAL ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$100 · revenue +120%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.