Woodbridge, ON · Charitable organization
Willow Ridge Chapel
To maintain and support a house of worship with services conducted in accordance with the tenets and doctrines of the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$12k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Maple Community Church | C$95,053 |
| Western Ontario District of the Pentecostal Assemblies of Ca | C$7,500 |
| Toronto District Christian High School | C$2,500 |
| Willowdale Pentecostal Church | C$1,820 |
| Safehope Home | C$650 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$97k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TPThe Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada2× · 2018–2019 · C$9k · revenue +10%
- TDToronto District Christian High School3× · 2018–2020 · C$4k · revenue +9%
- EREMERGENCY RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT FUND-ERDO2× · 2017–2018 · C$4k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- TLTHE LIGHTHOUSEone grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +11%
- CCCentreview Churchgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$3k · revenue +129%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operating and maintaining a church for spiritual growth and ministering the word of god.
Church Services Sunday School Bible Study Children's Ministry Youth Ministry Support of missionaries and evangelism. provide community support
Sunday school for all ages sunday worship services bible study youth and family events.
We hold weekly worship services with separate teaching times for adults and children. we provide weekly prayer meeting small groups prayer times and bible studies. we provide pastoral care.
Prayer meetings Bible studies Sunday morning worship
Preaching Teaching
We are involved with missions we are invlved with sunday school for children
Weekly worship service pastoral care
Preaching the word of god bible studies counselling community outreach supporting local and international missions reaching out to new immigrants and international students
Sunday school for all ages sunday am & pm worship services bible study youth and family
Weekly worship services provide classes and programs for religious instruction provide support for christian ministries provide opportunities for christian education fellowship training and activities for all ages provide counselling to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lighthouse Christian Social Services and the most unlike its peers is Erdo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Maple Community Church ↗
- Who funds The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada ↗
- Who funds Toronto District Christian High School ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT FUND-ERDO ↗
- Who funds Safehope Home ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Centreview Church ↗
- Who funds Willowdale Pentecostal Church ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Link Charity Canada Inc · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.