Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Port Hope, ON · Charitable organization

Willow Beach Field Naturalists Club

Provide annual environmental scholarship & school awards; provide donations to local environmental charities ( eg wildlife rescue organizations); stewardship of peter's wood provincial nature reserve; provide guided nature outings; produce regular informative club newsletter ( the curlew); participate in citizen science projects that…

C$750
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$250
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$250
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONTARIO TUTLR CONSERVATION CENTREC$250
FRIENDS OF PRESQU'ILE PARKC$250
SANDY PINES WILDLIFE CENTREC$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$7k · 9 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

C$7k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+77%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • OT
    ONTARIO TURTLE CONSERVATION CENTRE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$1k · revenue +78%
  • PH
    Port Hope and District Agricultural Society
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$1k · revenue +49%
  • SP
    SANDY PINES WILDLIFE CENTRE
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$850 · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • NC
    Nature Conservancy Canadagraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +101%
  • SC
    SOPER CREEK WILDLIFE RESCUE
    one grant, 2023 · C$250
  • LP
    LONE PINE LAND TRUST
    one grant, 2019 · C$200 · revenue -63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildlife Preservation Trust Canada/

Wildlife preservation canada exists to save animal species at risk from extinction in canada by performing hands-on action for species requiring direct intervention to recover. wpc build canada's conservation capacity by providing…

—
2
Bird Ecology and Conservation Ontario

1. Research to advance the conservation of songbird species at risk in agricultural landscapes; and 2. Research to improve our understanding of the distribution abundance and productivity of songbird species at risk.

—
3
Island Nature Trust

land acquisition through donation and purchase application of protection to those lands stewardship and management to retain ecological integrity protection and monitoring of species-at-risk nature education and engagement programs…

—
4
Land Conservancy for Kingston Frontenac Lennox and Addington

The Land Conservancy for Kingston Frontenac and Lennox & Addington (LC-KFL&A) owns 13 properties (one property newly acquired in 2022) and 2 conservation easements totalling just over 450 hectares of protected land providing habitat for 18…

—
5
Toronto Wildlife Centre

As the busiest wildlife centre in the country every day communities rely on Toronto Wildlife Centre (TWC) for help. Staffed and equipped specially for wildlife medicine TWC's wildlife emergency hospital is the only one of its kind in the…

—
6
Turtle Pond Wildlife Centre

We rehabiliate injured orphanes or ill wildlife in northeastern ontario. we also provide information on wildlife on wildlife issues and assist in (non-invasive) wildlife research.

—
7
Wcs Wildlife Conservation Society Canada

Wcs canada provides evidence-based expert guidance and policy recommendations to empower decision-makers to take transformative action for wildlife ecosystems and people. through our own research accumulated expertise and understanding of…

—
8
National Wildlife Centre

NWC is focused on helping sick injured and orphaned native wildlife species through wildlife medical care rehabilitation & training. More than 500 animals were seen for medical treatment over the past year and most were released by…

—
9
The Bruce Trail Conservancy

The Bruce Trail Conservancy (BTC) is one of Ontario’s largest land trusts and the steward of Canada’s longest marked footpath. We actively preserve and care for land within the Niagara Escarpment UNESCO World Biosphere to protect its…

—
10
Natureserve Canada

The preservation of the natural environment by undertaking supporting and supervising research made available to the public.

—
11
Ontario Nature Inc.

1) the federation of ontario naturalists (operating as ontario nature) protects ontario's wild species and wild spaces through conservation education and public engagement. 2) the federation of ontario naturalists (operating as ontario…

—
12
Oceans Research and Conservation Association - Orca

Research and studies related to the conservation of marine life; identifying endangered marine species determining what their habitat needs are and how best to protect them and building the evidence base to support conservation efforts.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kawartha Wildlife Centre and the most unlike its peers is Trent University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNature Conservancy Canada — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONTARIO TURTLE CONSERVATION CENTRE — C$1,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPort Hope and District Agricultural Society — C$1,060 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY PINES WILDLIFE CENTRE — C$850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PRESQU'ILE PARK — C$850 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetThe Owl Foundation — C$750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKawartha Wildlife Centre — C$600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBird Studies Canada — C$600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFatal Light Awareness Program — C$400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThickson's Woods Heritage Foundation — C$400 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLONE PINE LAND TRUST — C$200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTrent University — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORHTUMBERLAND LAND TRUST — C$200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSt. John's Ambulance — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Td Friends of the Env…National Wildlife Reh…Helen McCrea Peacock …Ontario Power Generat…The Calgary FoundationPrivate Giving Founda…Strategic Charitable …Charities Aid Foundat…Charitable Gift Funds…My Tribute Gift Found…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…United Way of Greater…
Td Friends of the Environment FoundationON9.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Td Friends of the Environment Foundation · National Wildlife Rehabilitation Foundation · Helen McCrea Peacock Foundation · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · The Calgary Foundation · Private Giving Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under public amenities.

Source object 119298883:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Willow Beach Field Naturalists Club’s filings →