Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Private foundation

Whitestone Foundation Inc.

The foundation received charitable registration 2016-09-07 and received its first donation 2016-11-23.

C$145k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$22k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$123k
C$16,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$752k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAYC$45,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADAC$25,000
ART CITYC$19,300
B'NAI BRITH CAMPC$18,000
COMBINED JEWISH APPEALC$16,000
HARVEST MANITOBAC$6,500
JEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICESC$4,500
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGESC$4,000
AGAPE TABLEC$4,000
CHILDREN'S WISHC$3,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$510k · 9 repeat orgsC$43k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

C$510k
C$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
0%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$236k · revenue +24%
  • AC
    ART CITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$100k · revenue +20%
  • CJ
    COMBINED JEWISH APPEAL
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$90k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA
    one grant, 2024 · C$25k · revenue 0%
  • BB
    B'NAI BRITH CAMP
    one grant, 2024 · C$18k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Banks Mississauga

We lead our agency network to realize a food-secure Mississauga by providing and promoting access to healthy and appropriate food. We provide emergency food so neighbours in need have food TODAY. We advocate for government policies and…

—
2
Jewish Community Campus of Winnipeg Inc.

We enable several charities to effectively use their resources to carry on their charitable programs by providing a central facility for which to carry on such activities.

—
3
Mazon Canada

The charity raises money primarily from the jeiwsh community and distributes grants to front line organizations that fight hunger

—
4
Food Banks Canada/Banques Alimentaires Canada

Food banks canada's mission is to provide national leadership to relieve hunger today and prevent hunger tomorrow in collaboration with the food bank network in canada. food banks canada is a national charitable organization dedicated to…

—
5
Second Harvest Canada Deuxième Récolte Canada

Second harvest is canada's largest food rescue organization and a global thought leader on perishable food recovery. operating at the intersection of hunger relief and environmental protection second harvest rescues perishable…

—
6
Manitoba Food Charter Inc.

To work with people in manitoba to increase opportunities for people to eat good food

—
7
Kids Against Hunger Canada

1) to relieve poverty in canada and developing nations by packaging food to be distributed to needy persons. 2) to gift funds to qualifed donees as defined in subsection 149 1 (1) of the income tax act. 3) to undertake activities ancillary…

—
8
The Food Bank of Waterloo Region

The food bank of waterloo region (the food bank) acquires coordinates and distributes food to the community food assistance network - a system of 100+ community organizations providing food and support to those in need. these organizations…

—
9
Food Banks of Saskatchewan Corporation

Acquire food and consumer products by donation or otherwise for distribution to agencies serving the hungry and for distribution to member food banks. receive and distribute to member food banks donations and gifts of any kind made for the…

—
10
End Homelessness Winnipeg Inc.

To bring together all sectors of our community to work with people who are experiencing homelessness so that together we can prevent homelessness support recovery and wellbeing find suitable housing and measure our success in ways that…

—
11
The Winnipeg Foundation

The winnipeg foundation connects donors from all walks of life with local charitable organizations that help our city flourish for all. the winnipeg foundation is an endowment-based organization which means gifts received are pooled and…

—
12
Jewish Women International Foundation of Winnipeg

Programs committed to improving the quality of life for women, children and families and end the cycle of violence through education and advocacy.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harvest Manitoba Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Art City Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY — C$236,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetART CITY — C$100,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetCOMBINED JEWISH APPEAL — C$89,800 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHARVEST MANITOBA — C$28,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI BRITH CAMP — C$18,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES — C$13,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAGAPE TABLE — C$12,300 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES — C$12,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S WISH — C$11,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD FOOD BANK — C$6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds ART CITY ↗
  • Who funds COMBINED JEWISH APPEAL ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST MANITOBA ↗
  • Who funds NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI BRITH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE TABLE ↗
  • Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S WISH ↗
  • Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD FOOD BANK ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jewish Foundation of ManitobaMB9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · The Winnipeg Foundation · All Charities Campaign · Lawton Partners Charitable Giving Foundation Inc. · The Asper Foundation · Abundance Canada · Private Giving Foundation · BenefAction Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 792727521:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Whitestone’s filings →