White Head Island, NB · Charitable organization
White Head Baptist Church
We hold weekly worship services.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIBLICAL MINISTRIES WORLDWIDE | C$9,268 |
| ISRAEL'S HOPE | C$7,788 |
| MISSION GO. | C$6,176 |
| NEW BRUNSWICK BIBLE INSTITUTE | C$4,092 |
| PIONEERS. | C$3,224 |
| PARTNER'S INTERNATIONAL | C$2,240 |
| SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION | C$1,076 |
| ONE HOPE | C$1,044 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BMBIBLICAL MINISTRIES WORLDWIDE6× · 2019–2024 · C$56k · revenue +125%
- MGMISSION GO.8× · 2017–2024 · C$49k · revenue +50%
- PPIONEERS.8× · 2017–2024 · C$26k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · C$2k
- CMCENTRAL MISSIONARY CLEANING HOUSEone grant, 2021 · C$2k
- SISUNDAN INTERIOR MISSIONone grant, 2022 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.