Wheatley, ON · Charitable organization
Wheatley Lions Club Charitabletrust
Bursaries given to students
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VILLAGE RESOURCE CENTRE | C$1,500 |
| BURSARIES (2 STUDENTS) | C$1,000 |
| CHATHAM-KENT HOSPICE | C$500 |
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS CANADA | C$500 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$500 |
| TWO CREEKS ASSOCIATION | C$500 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$500 |
| DISTRICT A-1 LIONS (LAKE JOSEPH TRANSPORTATION) | C$500 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$230 |
| CHILDREN'S TREATMENT CENTER FOUNDATION OF CHATHAM-KENT | C$200 |
| CHATHAM-KENT PUBLIC LIBRARY | C$200 |
| DISTRICT A-1 YOUTH EXCHANGE | C$200 |
| WHEATLEY HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY | C$200 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$200 |
| DISTRICT A-1 SIGHT CONSERVATION FOUNDATION (EYES RIGHT) | C$200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 44% of grant dollars (C$12k). The 56% that went abroad (C$15k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 56% of all-years giving (C$15k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- B(BURSARIES (2 STUDENTS)6× · 2019–2024 · C$6k
- IGIndividual grant recipient6× · 2019–2024 · C$2k
- WFWHEATLEY FOOD BANK3× · 2021–2023 · C$2k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · C$500
- DADISTRICT A-1 YOUTH EXCHANGE PROGRAMone grant, 2023 · C$500
- CKCHATHAM KENT HOSPICE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2019–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.