Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Weyburn, SK · Charitable organization

Weyburn Church of Christ

Weekly worship services annual lectureship support missionaries world disaster relief itinerant preaching program

C$101k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$81k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$20k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$81k
C$2,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEARVIEW CHRISTIAN CAMPC$81,090
GREAT LAKES BIBLE COLLEGEC$5,500
CHURCH OF CHRISTC$5,500
GENTLE ROAD CHURCH IF CHRISTC$2,374
TRUE NORTH HELPING HANDSC$2,000
CHURCH OF CHRISTC$1,500
LETS START TALKING CANADAC$1,200
GREAT LAKES HIGH SCHOOLC$1,000
ZAMBIA MISSION FUND CANADAC$600
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$492k · 11 repeat orgsC$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

C$492k
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+2%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLEARVIEW CHRISTIAN CAMP
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$233k · revenue +694%
  • GL
    GREAT LAKES CHRISTIAN COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$125k · revenue +47%
  • CO
    CHURCH OF CHRIST
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$26k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2021 · C$3k
  • CC
    CLEARVIEW CHRISTIAN CAMP
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF CHRIST (SOUTH EDMONTON)
    one grant, 2019 · C$3k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Church of Christ
—
2
Church of Christ
—
3
Church of Christ

Sunday worship service & Bible classes Wednesday evening Bible study

—
4
Church of Christ

Church

—
5
Church of Christ

Normal church activities

—
6
Church of Christ (Disciples)

Worship services religious education missions community outreach religious fellowship

—
7
Grand Valley Church of Christ

Sunday worship service and bible study

—
8
Northwest Church of Christ Inc

Adult classes- teaching God's Word; Children's classes- teaching God's Word; Missions- sharing God's Word with others

—
9
Central Church of Christ
—
10
International Bible College
—
11
Corporation of Christ Church

Worship services bible study outreach

—
12
Long Creek Baptist Church

Worship services sunday school bible studies

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saskatoon Church of Christ Corp. and the most unlike its peers is True North Helping Hands Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLEARVIEW CHRISTIAN CAMP — C$232,965 over 7y, 20% of budgetGREAT LAKES CHRISTIAN COLLEGE — C$125,475 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetTRUE NORTH HELPING HANDS — C$32,500 over 2y, 44% of budgetCHURCH OF CHRIST — C$25,900 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetDAUPHIN CHURCH OF CHRIST 2004 INC — C$20,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetGENTLE ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST — C$15,744 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetPRAIRIE BREEZE FOUNDATION INC — C$10,800 over 2y, 44% of budgetCHURCH OF CHRIST — C$10,200 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetLET'S START TALKING CANADA — C$9,900 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetGREAT LAKES BIBLE COLLEGE — C$5,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetZAMBIA MISSION FUND CANADA — C$4,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCHURCH OF CHRIST (CENTRAL CONGREGATION INC.) — C$3,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHURCH OF CHRIST (SOUTH EDMONTON) — C$2,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHURCH OF CHRIST — C$1,950 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEARVIEW CHRISTIAN CAMP ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TRUE NORTH HELPING HANDS ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH OF CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds DAUPHIN CHURCH OF CHRIST 2004 INC ↗
  • Who funds GENTLE ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE BREEZE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH OF CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds LET'S START TALKING CANADA ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ZAMBIA MISSION FUND CANADA ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH OF CHRIST (CENTRAL CONGREGATION INC.) ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH OF CHRIST (SOUTH EDMONTON) ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH OF CHRIST ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Church of Christ (Cen…Carman Church of Chri…Western Christian Col…Gravelbourg Church of…Bengough Church of Ch…Calgary Church of Chr…Regina Church of Chri…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Church of Christ (Central Congregation) Inc.MB11.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Church of Christ (Central Congregation) Inc. · Carman Church of Christ · Western Christian College · Gravelbourg Church of Christ · Bengough Church of Christ · Calgary Church of Christ · Regina Church of Christ · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119296549:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Weyburn Church of Christ’s filings →