Surrey, BC · Charitable organization
Westwinds Community Church
Westwinds maintains a place of worship of god we provide christian fellowship for those of like faith and we assume our share of the responsibility and privilege of propagating the gospel of jesus christ by all available means with ours and surrounding communities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA | C$3,600 |
| SUMMIET PACIFIC CANADA | C$500 |
| BLUE SEA FOUNDATION | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$600 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PAPentecostal Assemblies of Canada8× · 2017–2024 · C$33k · revenue +22%
- PAPENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA BC & YUKON DIV.3× · 2017–2019 · C$11k
- PMPAOC MISSION LINK2× · 2021–2022 · C$7k · revenue -68%
Funded once
- TCTHE CANADIAN RED CROSS SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue -47%
- CPCanuck Place Childrens Hospicegraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$163 · revenue +76%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
International outreach whereby staff and students of pacific academy travel aboard for short term mission and assist in orphanages schools etc.
To help deprived children in the philippines
Free telephone and text support to prenatal/postpartum mothers fathers and new parents experiencing depression and/or anxiety and to their families. Support groups throughout the Lower Mainland of BC. Support groups for new parents in…
Place of Rescue seeks to raise awareness and financial support for Rescue Cambodia. Place of Rescue is a safe haven for families living with AIDS orphan children and orphan grannies and young unmarried pregnant women.
To operate an academic college.
Compassion Canada is a leading Christian child development organization whose mission is to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Our proven child development program provides infants children and youth around the world with the…
The society operates as pacific academy an independent christian school with the purpose of providing programs to prepare students for services leadership and excellence by providing the best spiritual intellectual and physical development…
The charity specializes in major international disasters.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada/Les Assemblees De La Pentecote Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Summit Pacific College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.