Victoria, BC · Charitable organization
Westview Gospel Chapel
Regular religious service financial support of missionaries in canada and abroad food hampers and support for needy individual or families
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$13k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSIONARY SERVICE COMMITTEE CANADA | C$42,300 |
| NEWS OF QUEBEC | C$6,000 |
| IMADENE SOCIETY | C$6,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | C$800 |
| VICTORIA LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRY | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MSMISSIONARY SERVICE COMMITTEE CANADA7× · 2017–2024 · C$315k · revenue +57%
- ISIMADENE SOCIETY8× · 2017–2024 · C$48k · revenue +4%
- MSMUSTARD SEED3× · 2020–2022 · C$4k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- MSMISSIONARY SERVICE COMMITTEE CANADAone grant, 2023 · C$40k
- MSMORNING STAR BIBLE CAMPgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$10k · revenue +33%
- OBOAK BAY GOSPEL ASSEMBLYone grant, 2021 · C$3k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Global missions incorporated is an organization whose mission is the promotion of the gospel and the relief of poverty.
Overseeing the preparation promotion communication and distribution of the holy scriptures and their message together with other christian literature and other materials. supplying humanitarian aid and any other assistance that will enable…
An ongoing program of christian evangelism along with donations to other ministries and organizations for christian evangelism was continued.
Financially support overseas missionaries by raising funds and sent to another registered charity. (twr) (trans world canada)
Support missionary work
Printed and distributed religious literature through subscription and free distribution. also preached the gospel and did evangelical work
Csm canada inc.'s purpose is to proclaim the gospel of jesus christ throughout the world. volunteers collect used bibles and christian books as well as medical and educational books from donors. these materials are sent to csm canada inc.…
Provide financial support of missionaries and mission organizations
Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns
1. Received donations for missions outreach 2. Supported overseas mission outreach
Providing support for missionary organizations evangelism and social services
Missions support and religious publishing distribution
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Msc Canada and the most unlike its peers is Victoria Lighthouse Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oak Bay Gospel Assembly · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.