Mississauga, ON · Charitable organization
Westside Presbyterian Church
We provide ; Worship services on Sunday Wednesday and Friday.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Imitating Christ Ministry | C$6,000 |
| SEED International | C$2,400 |
| Love Corps | C$2,400 |
| GBC vancouver | C$2,400 |
| Korean-Canadian Physically Challenged Adult Community | C$2,400 |
| Hope in Christ Ministries | C$2,400 |
| Serving In Mission | C$2,400 |
| The Milal Mission | C$2,400 |
| Joy Mission | C$2,400 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ICImitating Christ Ministries8× · 2017–2024 · C$97k · revenue +50%
- THTHE HOLY ONE COMMUNITY CHURCH2× · 2020–2021 · C$60k · revenue +170%
- HIHOPE IN CHRIST MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · C$19k · revenue +513% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- VCVaughan Community Churchone grant, 2019 · C$10k · revenue -14%
- EUEdmonton Urban Native Ministrygraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue +81%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1) preaching the god's words to the people through out regular services. 2) passing out the god's words to the people in the neighbour through the various missionary activities. 3) teaching the bible to the children and adult church…
1. Teaching the Word of God and preaching the Gospel of Jesus 2. Working with Individual missionaries and mission organizations engaged in the propagation of Jesus Christ 3. Direct evangelism and discipleship of national Christians
Regulars church services and Activities including Radio and TV Programs
Regular sunday worship services sunday school prayer meetings pastoral visitation for needy mission activities.
Place of worship missionary evangelism social outreach religious fellowship
Provide regular weekly christian worship services - provide christian education and fillowship including bible study - mission and oureach activities
To preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the people by providing worship services and Christian education classes to the congregation. To edify the existing congregation members of the church by providing fellowship meetings prayer meeting…
Sunday christian worship services children's sunday school program prayer meetings gospel music service -bible study charitable and missionary activities
Church activities with missionary outreach
Visiting the spiritually troubled individuals at their place of residence and providing assistance. bible studies missionary training.
Preaching the god's words to public through the regular services on sundays
Church ministry 1. worship god 2. evangelism 3. teaching and preaching the holy scripture 4. equip members and other related ministries of the gospel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sim Canada and the most unlike its peers is For You Telecare Family Service (Futfs) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CANADA IACO ↗
- Who funds Imitating Christ Ministries ↗
- Who funds THE HOLY ONE COMMUNITY CHURCH ↗
- Who funds BRAMPTON LIFE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds SEED CANADA ↗
- Who funds JOY WOMEN & CHILDREN MISSION SOCIETY OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds HOPE IN CHRIST MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds The Milal Mission ↗
- Who funds LOVE CORPS MISSION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds KCPCAC ↗
- Who funds GBC Vancouver ↗
- Who funds MAUM LIFE COACHING & COUNSELLING CENTRE ↗
- Who funds Vaughan Community Church ↗
- Who funds Maranatha Community Church ↗
- Who funds Serving In Mission ↗
- Who funds FOR YOU TELECARE FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Edmonton Urban Native Ministry ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Coram Deo Foundation · Toronto Korean Yum-Kwang Presbyterian Church · Light Presbyterian Church · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.