Peterborough, ON · Charitable organization
Westmount Bible Chapel of Peterborough
Corporate worship bible teaching youth and children's programs bible studies christian missionary support - local national and international.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KAWARTHA CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | C$8,400 |
| ETHNOS CANADA | C$5,847 |
| MSC CANADA | C$5,847 |
| SHAREWOOD GLOBAL CANADA | C$2,544 |
| COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION | C$1,200 |
| HERITAGE | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -1% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MCMSC CANADA3× · 2022–2024 · C$20k · revenue -2%
- KCKAWARTHA CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL3× · 2022–2024 · C$19k · revenue +26%
- ECETHNOS CANADA3× · 2022–2024 · C$18k · revenue -1%
Funded once
- CCCANADIAN CENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN CHARITIESone grant, 2021 · C$2k
- JCJUSTICE CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMSone grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue -18%
- CCCANADIAN CENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN CHARITIESone grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
Transforming lives through god's word through bible translation bible publishing and bible engagement programs throughout canada and the world.
Missionary training -bible studies
A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide
Provide academic training for the ministry of the gospel
Christian Missions funding to advance the Christian Gospel
The mission of global scholars canada is to identify develop send equip and support missional christian academics for work primarily in open enrollment post secondary institutions around the world with the objective to inspire and…
Training for christian ministry through undergraduate and graduate training.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Msc Canada and the most unlike its peers is Kawartha Classical Christian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.