Chilliwack, BC · Private foundation
Westbow Foundation
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$60k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$495k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HUNGRY FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL | C$495,498 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$60,235 |
| WORD & DEED | C$20,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$60k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HFHUNGRY FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL3× · 2022–2024 · C$2.3M · revenue +0% · 28% of their budget
- WDWORK & DEED3× · 2022–2024 · C$50k · revenue +17%
- CHCHILLIWACK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · C$2k · revenue +374%
Funded once
- FAFUNDACION AMG INTERNATIONALone grant, 2023 · C$41k
- CCCYRUS CENTRE MINISTRIESone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +2%
- HMHOCKEY MARATHON OF HOPEone grant, 2022 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.