Skip to content

Victoria, BC · Charitable organization

West Shore Poppy Fund Committee

Providing financial assistance and support including medical appliances and equipment to veterans and their families who are in need; to drop-in centres and services in the community where veterans would benefit; provide bursaries and poster & literary awards to school children of veterans and in the community and to provide support to…

C$65k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k13 grants · C$45k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$277k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$20,000
LEGION FOUNDATION - VANCOUVER ISLAND COMPASSION DOGS PROGRAMC$5,000
LEGION FOUNDATION - COCKRELL HOUSE - SMVIZ HOUSING SOCIETYC$5,000
WESCOM MEDI-LEND SOCIETYC$5,000
BROADMEAD CARE FOUNDATIONC$5,000
PRIORY HOSPITAL - VICTORIA ELDER CARE FOUNDATIONC$5,000
WEST SHORE ADULT DAY PROGRAM - VICTORIA ELDERCARE FOUNDATIONC$5,000
LEGION FOUNDATION - VETERANS TRANSITIONC$3,000
LEGION FOUNDATION - BCIT MILITARY SKILLS PROGRAMC$2,000
LEGION FOUNDATION - LEGION MANORC$2,000
848 ROYAL ROADS AIR CADETSC$2,000
2483 PPCLI ARMY CADETSC$2,000
263 RCSCC BEACON HILL SEA CADETSC$2,000
NLCC ADMIRAL FALLS NAVY LEAGUE CADETSC$2,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 89% of grant dollars (C$247k). The 11% that went abroad (C$29k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 11% of all-years giving (C$29k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$246k · 5 repeat orgsC$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

C$246k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
0%

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    Legion Foundation - SMVIZ Housing Society - Cockrell House
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$97k · revenue +93%
  • GV
    GREATER VICTORIA ELDER CARE FOUNDATION - WEST SHORE ADULT DA
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$70k · revenue +337%
  • BC
    Broadmead Care Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$35k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • LF
    Legion Foundation-RCEL, Commonwealth Ex-Service League
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k
  • RC
    ROYAL COMMONWEALTH EX-SERVICES LEAGUE
    one grant, 2022 · C$1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLegion Foundation - SMVIZ Housing Society - Cockrell House — C$96,500 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetGREATER VICTORIA ELDER CARE FOUNDATION - WEST SHORE ADULT DA — C$70,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetBroadmead Care Foundation — C$35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWESCOM MEDI-LEND SOCIETY — C$35,000 over 7y, 27% of budgetLegion Foundation-RCEL, Commonwealth Ex-Service League — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Legion Foundation - SMVIZ Housing Society - Cockrell House ↗
  • Who funds GREATER VICTORIA ELDER CARE FOUNDATION - WEST SHORE ADULT DA ↗
  • Who funds Broadmead Care Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WESCOM MEDI-LEND SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds VANCOUVER ISLAND COMPASSION DOGS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Legion Foundation-RCEL, Commonwealth Ex-Service League ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bc Government Employees Community Services Fund TrustBC7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bc Government Employees Community Services Fund Trust · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-09-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 891297343:2023-09-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on West Shore Poppy Fund Committee’s filings →