Carp, ON · Charitable organization
West Ottawa Christian Community
We hold weekly services and sunday school classes.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRST CENTURY FOUNDATIONS | C$5,955 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$5,955 |
| GREATNESS CHURCH MINISTRIES | C$3,788 |
| CELEBRATION! CHURCH | C$3,358 |
| LOVE MADE REAL MINISTRIES | C$2,382 |
| BETHESDA FELLOWSHIP | C$2,382 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$18k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSION6× · 2017–2022 · C$26k · revenue +20%
- FCFIRST CENTURY FOUNDATIONS7× · 2017–2023 · C$14k · revenue +72%
- CCELEBRATION!CHURCH3× · 2022–2024 · C$13k · revenue +629%
Funded once
- FCFIRST CENTURY FOUNDATIONSone grant, 2024 · C$6k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · C$6k
- GCGREATNESS CHURCH MINISTRIESone grant, 2024 · C$4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Revive nations is a ministry with a passion to raise jesus lovers across the world and on a mission to win souls for jesus touching nations one life at a time.
Evangelical ministry
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Missionary and teaching the word and spirit message in liberia isreal and dominica with employees and volunteers.
Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.
Spread the gospel of jesus christ
Spread the gospel of Jesus Christ, bible studies and worship.
Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
Men's ministry women's ministry prayer meetings group bible study community outreach leadership trainings praise and worship trainings
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Century Foundations and the most unlike its peers is Jericho Road Ministries - Ministere Route De Jericho. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.