Peters Road, PE · Charitable organization
Wellspring Presbyterian Church
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CANADA | C$4,255 |
| SOUTHERN KINGS AND QUEEN FOOD BANK INC | C$2,530 |
| KIGNS COUNTRY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$1,855 |
| PRESBYTERIAN WORLD SERVICE & DEVELOPMENT | C$1,500 |
| CAMP KEIR | C$1,500 |
| SAMITARIAN'S PURSE CANADA | C$1,360 |
| ISLAND PREGNANCY CENTRE | C$1,035 |
| HOSPICE OF SOUTHERN KINGS COUNTY INC | C$705 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CKCAMP KEIR8× · 2017–2024 · C$13k · revenue +28%
- SKSOUTHERN KINGS AND QUEEN FOOD BANK INC8× · 2017–2024 · C$11k · revenue +220%
- WIWINNIPEG INNER CITY MISSIONS5× · 2017–2023 · C$5k · revenue +122%
Funded once
- TCTHE CANADIAN RED CROSSone grant, 2022 · C$510 · revenue -47%
- KCKNOX COLLEGEone grant, 2019 · C$351 · revenue +24%
- FHFarmers Helping Farmers Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$300 · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious organization ministering to the hospital needs of the congregation.
Supports missions of presbyterian church in canada outside the community community food bank and foster child pastoral care bible study sunday school for children vacation bible school for children children going to christian camps.
Operates a food bank and supports hot meal programs in the kingston area
Presbyterians Sharing Presbyterian World Service & Development World Vision Camp Kintail Crop Share Rural Response for Healthy Children (Huron County Christmas Bureau)
The izaak walton killam health centre provides quality in-patient and out-patient care for children women and families in the three maritime provinces and beyond. it is a tertiary care health centre providing ambulatory care services and…
To improve the effectiveness of other registered charities by providing expertise on operating a hospital in a manner that enhances a secular healthcare mission. kingston general health was previously known as kingston general hospital…
Missions
Hospice services.
Christian camping program on keats island bc.
Religious services supported mission work in leamington and others through the presbyterian church in canada pastoral care support to members
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Samaritan's Purse - Canada and the most unlike its peers is Knox College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Presbyterian Church of Canada ↗
- Who funds CAMP KEIR ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN KINGS AND QUEEN FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds WINNIPEG INNER CITY MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF SOUTHERN KINGS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SAMITARIAN'S PURSE CANADA ↗
- Who funds KIGNS COUNTRY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ISLAND PREGNANCY CENTRE ↗
- Who funds THE CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds KNOX COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Farmers Helping Farmers Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Prince Edward Island · Canada Donates Inc. · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.