Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Saint-Constant, QC · Private foundation

Weider Foundation/Fondation Weider

To promote physical fitness and health in general on a wholewide basis.

C$229k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$79,138
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEN WEIDER EDUCATION FUNDC$100,000
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONC$79,138
CAMP MASSADC$50,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 84% of grant dollars (C$1.6M). The 16% that went abroad (C$306k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 16% of all-years giving (C$306k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$231k · 3 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.7M · 7 repeat orgsC$145k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

C$1.7M
C$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+14%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHAYA MUSHKA SEMINARY / SÉMINAIRE CHAYA MUSHKA
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$466k · revenue +66%
  • BW
    BEN WEIDER EDUCATION FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$350k · revenue +173% · 53% of their budget
  • FP
    FONDATION PÈRE SABLON
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$150k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · C$70k · revenue +14%
  • LO
    Les oeuvres du PÈRE SABLONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$50k · revenue +31%
  • IN
    INTERNATIONAL NAPOLEONIC SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · C$25k · revenue -83% · 98% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation Educative Jean-Jacques-Bertrand

Campagne de financement et souper bénéfice

—
2
La Fondation De L'ecole De Formation Hebraique

Raising funds for jewish education in the west island of montreal

—
3
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
4
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
5
Fondation universitaire de l'école des hautes études commerciales de Montréal
—
6
Grand Seminaire De Montreal
—
7
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
8
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
9
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
10
Bach - Academie De Montreal

L'organisme vise à soulinger la vie de jean-sébastien bach en organisant un festival de musique annuel dans la région de montréal.

—
11
La Fondation De L'ecole Paul-Bruchesi De Montreal
—
12
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Oeuvres De Sablon and the most unlike its peers is The International Napoleonic Society/La Societe Napoleonienne Internationale. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHAYA MUSHKA SEMINARY / SÉMINAIRE CHAYA MUSHKA — C$465,888 over 3y, 16% of budgetBEN WEIDER EDUCATION FUND — C$350,000 over 5y, 53% of budgetSYLVAN ADAMS YM-TWHA — C$250,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFONDATION PÈRE SABLON — C$150,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetJEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$120,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP MASSAD — C$100,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY — C$70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLes oeuvres du PÈRE SABLON — C$50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL NAPOLEONIC SOCIETY — C$25,000 over 1y, 98% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Conam Charitable Foun…Canadahelps Canadon
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC8.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Conam Charitable Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 888733854:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Weider Foundation/Fondation Weider’s filings →