Oakville, ON · Private foundation
We Love You Connie Foundation
Charitable donations to registered canadian charitable foundations
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$60k
- C$50k–250k3 grants · C$285k
- C$250k+2 grants · C$500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION CANADA | C$250,000 |
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION CANADA | C$250,000 |
| SICK KIDS FOUNDATION | C$175,000 |
| THE MONTREAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | C$60,000 |
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION CANADA | C$50,000 |
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION CANADA | C$40,000 |
| PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION | C$20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 71% of grant dollars (C$2.1M). The 29% that went abroad (C$845k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 29% of all-years giving (C$845k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$845k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SFSICKKIDS FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2023 · C$1.0M · revenue +60%
- TPTHE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2023 · C$240k · revenue +51%
- TMTHE MONTREAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · C$120k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- KHKIDS' HEALTH LINKSgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$13k · revenue +36%
- LPLIGHTHOUSE PROGRAMone grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.