Vancouver, BC · Private foundation
Von Mandl Family Foundation
We financially support qualified donees in the principal areas of education and the arts.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Sarah McLachlan School of Music | C$72,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CCCanadian Constitution Foundation4× · 2017–2021 · C$635k · revenue +13%
- SMSarah McLachlan School of Music3× · 2018–2024 · C$133k · revenue +57%
- TDThe Duke of Edinburgh's International Award5× · 2017–2022 · C$125k · revenue +132%
Funded once
- PAPacific Autism Family Centregraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$106k · revenue +32%
- UOUniversity of Victoriaone grant, 2023 · C$50k · revenue +10%
- UOUniversity of British Columbiagraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$15k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Asian pacific outreach program: pacific rim educational programs: british columbia schools & universities
BCIT is a public polytechnic institute that operates across five campuses located in the Metro Vancouver region. BCIT provides post secondary education to nearly 50 000 students in subjects ranging from applied and natural sciences…
Post-Secondary Education
The University of the Fraser Valley is a special purpose teaching university. The University is governed by a Board of Governors the majority of which are appointed by the Province of British Columbia. The primary purpose of the University…
To contribute to the development of physical and cultural attributes in young canadians between the ages of 14 and 25
Distributes awards and grants to Langara College students and funds other student related projects initiatives and programs.
Scholarships bursaries awards to support education and research in architecture.
The Vancouver Public Library Foundation was established in 1997 to enhance the programs collections services and spaces of the Vancouver Public Library; programs and spaces for everyone in the City of Vancouver.
Sfu offers undergraduate and graduate degrees in the faculties of applied science arts and social services beedie school of business education environment health sciences sciences and communication arts and technology. the university…
Scholarships awarded annually to students entering the university of victoria's teacher education program
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seaforth Highlanders of Canada Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Portrait Gallery of Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Canadian Constitution Foundation ↗
- Who funds Sarah McLachlan School of Music ↗
- Who funds The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award ↗
- Who funds Pacific Autism Family Centre ↗
- Who funds West Point Grey Academy Foundation ↗
- Who funds Seaforth Highlanders of Canada Foundation ↗
- Who funds Portrait Gallery of Canada ↗
- Who funds University of Victoria ↗
- Who funds University of British Columbia ↗
- Who funds Bard on the Beach Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Zlc Foundation · Diamond Foundation · Vancouver Foundation · United Way British Columbia · Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Canada Gives · Toronto Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · BenefAction Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.