Brampton, ON · Charitable organization
Vishwa Hindu Parishad of Ontario (Canada)
Religious services conducted on a periodic basis at various member's home Temples and religious places .
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SEWA CANADA INTERNATIONAL AID INC. | C$4,000 |
| EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF CANADA | C$2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 11% of grant dollars (C$7k). The 89% that went abroad (C$60k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 89% of all-years giving (C$60k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SSSEVA SAHAYOG FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2020 · C$34k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2018–2020 · C$5k
- DDDIVYA DURGA JYOTI HINDU SOCIETY2× · 2019–2020 · C$1k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · C$21k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.