Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Upper Tracy, NB · Charitable organization

Village of Hope Inc.

Ongoing programs: we provide christian counselling and addiction treatment for men women and their families.

C$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$376
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACOPC$3,500
COMPASSION CANADAC$376
ROYAL CANADIAN CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH #55C$55
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$19k · 5 repeat orgsC$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

C$19k
C$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+21%

Still filing today

80%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ACOP
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$10k · revenue +65%
  • NL
    NEW LIFE RECOVERY MINISTRIES
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$5k · revenue +57%
  • CC
    COMPASSION CANADA
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • OH
    OKSANA HARVEST LIMITED
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue -71%
  • OF
    OROMOCTO FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k
  • EC
    ESTON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
AngelOne Canada

Conducts missionary work in the developing countries

—
2
Equip Leadership Canada

A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide

—
3
Training Leaders International Canada

To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.

—
4
Bic Canada - Global

Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…

—
5
International Christian Ministries

International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…

—
6
Charis Ministries Int'l Inc

To encourage Christian Faith by ministering to people in Canada and/or across the world and by providing Humanitarian Aid to help alleviate poverty and suffering.

—
7
International Christian Hope of Canada
—
8
Christ's Hope International- Canada

Providing health education by instruction to the public regarding hiv/aids; providing basic necessities of life such as shelter and medical assistance to children orphaned by hiv/aids; teaching the christian faith. all of 1-3 take place in…

—
9
Zadok Ministries International

1. Conducting evangelistic and worship services in areas of the world where churches need instruction and encouragement in proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ. 2. Providing leadership and instruction to ministers and church leaders with…

—
10
Hope Channel Canada

Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ maily through media

—
11
Global Disciples Canada

We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…

—
12
Ambassadors for Christ Canada

Provide leadership conferences training and church planting support in developing countries. Also to provide spiritual life and evangelism conferences in Canada as well as in first nations church community

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is HopeCity Canada Inc. and the most unlike its peers is The Helm Center Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetACOP — C$9,625 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEW LIFE RECOVERY MINISTRIES — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMPASSION CANADA — C$3,231 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOKSANA HARVEST LIMITED — C$2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetESTON COLLEGE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAN MISSION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HELM CENTER SOCIETY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUL CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC. — C$600 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHOPE CITY CHURCH — C$275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTD JAKES MINISTRIES — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROYAL CANADIAN LEGION — C$50 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Covenant Associates L…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
Covenant Associates LtdNB8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Covenant Associates Ltd · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under core health care.

Source object 832107551:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Village of Hope’s filings →