Skip to content

Mississauga, ON · Private foundation

Vijay Anand Foundation

The foundation continues to support other registered charities

C$139k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$23k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k13 grants · C$27k
  • C$10k–50k7 grants · C$113k
C$3,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRILLIUMC$23,400
PRIME QUADRANT FOUNDATIONC$20,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGEC$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTOC$15,000
OAKVILLE HOSPITALC$14,000
AIM FOR SEVAC$10,200
UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOOC$10,000
SEVA CANADAC$6,000
CANADIAN CANCER RESEARCHC$4,500
UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWAC$3,000
PEEL LEARNING CENTERC$3,000
HALTON LEARNING CENNTERC$3,000
CREATING HOPESC$2,000
OPERATION EYESIGHTC$2,000
RED CROSSC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$496k · 16 repeat orgsC$28k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

C$496k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+39%

Still filing today

100%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AIM For Sewa
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$196k · revenue +92%
  • T
    TRILLIUM
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$75k · revenue +130%
  • OH
    OAKVILLE HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$50k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • VC
    Vedanta Culture Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$4k · revenue +29%
  • RD
    RED DOOR SHELTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$700 · revenue +47%
  • M
    MOVEMBER
    one grant, 2020 · C$500 · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
2
Sunnybrook Research Institute

Sunnybrook Research Institute (SRI) is the research arm of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (SHSC) a teaching hospital fully affiliated with the University of Toronto. The vision of SRI is to invent the future of health care. Our main…

—
3
Canadian Friends of Iit Madras

To advance education by providing financial assistance scholarships and bursaries to students at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras (India). To promote Health by providing financial assistance to students at IIT Madras who…

—
4
Ovarian Cancer Canada/Cancer De L'ovaire Canada

Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…

—
5
Pratham Canada Foundation

Through programmes in canada raised awareness of illiteracy in india

—
6
Mona & Nav Aggarwal Foundation

Supporting qualified donees in Canada with emphasis on local hospitals cancer care religious institutions and organizations supporting sustainable development. To relieve poverty by providing clothing food housing and infrastructure to…

—
7
Hypertension Canada

Advancing the health of Canadians by enabling the detection prevention and control of high blood pressure and its complications. Hypertension Canada delivers against its mission/vision by striving for excellence in three core service…

—
8
Two Worlds Cancer Collaboration Foundation

Two Worlds Cancer Collaboration is harnessing Canada’s cancer knowledge and leadership to assist local health care professionals in resource-constrained countries in palliative care end-of-life care and cancer control strategies and…

—
9
Mississauga Foundation

First the Foundation brings donors to the table as community builders helping them formulate and realize their philanthropic goals matching their interest and concerns with community needs and organizations and finding innovative and…

—
10
Cancer Care Ontario

Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) is the provincial government agency responsible for driving health system performance improvement for Ontario's cancer and chronic kidney disease health systems. CCO also supports achievement of Ontario's Wait…

—
11
India Heritage Research Foundation (Ihrf) Canada

1) hospital support in canada 2) food supplies in canada 3) help/shelter/food/oxygen equipement 4) discourses for well being 5) mental health & global peace

—
12
Habib University Foundation Canada

The Foundation runs a scholarship program. In 2024 the successful applicants were students at Habib University in Karachi Pakistan.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sewa Canada International Aid Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Woodgreen Red Door Family Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAIM For Sewa — C$196,209 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetTRILLIUM — C$75,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOAKVILLE HOSPITAL — C$49,850 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSeva Canada — C$38,500 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetUniversity of Waterloo — C$34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHERIDAN COLLEGE — C$29,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO — C$25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRIME QUADRANT FOUNDATION — C$20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPeel Learning center — C$10,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHALTON LEARNING CENNTER — C$10,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Ottawa — C$6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCREATING HOPES — C$5,500 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER RESEARCH — C$5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION EYESIGHT — C$4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUNNYBROOK FOUNDATION — C$4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVedanta Culture Foundation — C$3,800 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFOOD BANK MISSISSAUGA — C$1,980 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMount Sinai Hospital — C$1,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRED DOOR SHELTER — C$700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAIN SOCIETY — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKSHAYPATRA — C$500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMOVEMBER — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSansar Gala — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEEL CRIME STOPPERS — C$200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRE OF MINDFULNESS — C$125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARYA SAMAJ MISSISSAUGA — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHindi Guild — C$100 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetVAISHNO DEVI TEMPLE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toronto FoundationON6.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toronto Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · BenefAction Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 894576958:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Vijay Anand’s filings →