Burnaby, BC · Charitable organization
Vancouver Hanin Church
Conducts regular Christians worship services on Sundays and Wednesdays.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VANCOUVER COMMUNITY OF HOPE | C$1,000 |
| JESUS DISCIPLE MOVEMENT SOCIETY | C$1,000 |
| NEW LIVINGSTONES FELLOWSHIP | C$1,000 |
| KOREAN NEW LEAF CANADA | C$1,000 |
| POO REUN NA MOO CHARITY FOUNDATIONS | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PRPOO REUN NA MOO CHARITY FOUNDATIONS7× · 2017–2024 · C$9k · revenue +73% · 100% of their budget
- TLTHE LIGHT OF LIFE NATIVE (DIR. KIM YO SUB)6× · 2017–2022 · C$7k · revenue +66%
- BCBROADWAY COMMUNITY OF HOPE7× · 2017–2024 · C$6k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- TWThe Water of Life Churchone grant, 2018 · C$980 · revenue -5%
- WCWYCLIFE Canada Missionone grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sunday worship and fellowship Sunday school Bible Study
Religious and relief activities including sunday service bible class sunday school and mission works
1. conduct regular divine worship services 2. conduct bible study 3. provide pastoral care
Sunday/wednesday service sunday school bible class prayer meeting mission works and other related activities.
Sunday christian worship services children's sunday school program prayer meetings gospel music service -bible study charitable and missionary activities
Regular sunday worship services sunday school prayer meetings pastoral visitation for needy mission activities.
We hold chirstian worship services in weekly base - bible studies to members - involved in local christian missionary works
Sunday service Sunday school Hangeul school Bible study Outreach Hospital and home visiting Various mission services
We hold weekly Christian worship services hold bible studies to members and involve in local Christian missionary works.
Sunday service sunday school prayer meeting music service christian education charitable and missionary activities.
Regular christian worship for korean community -bible study -fellowship meetings -prayer meetings -education and sunday schools -provide foods for homeless people -support missionaries
Weekly worship serivces bible study
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Korean New Leaf Church and the most unlike its peers is Poo-Reun-Na-Moo Charity Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds POO REUN NA MOO CHARITY FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds KOREAN NEW LEAF CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHT OF LIFE NATIVE (DIR. KIM YO SUB) ↗
- Who funds BROADWAY COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds New Livingstones Fellowship ↗
- Who funds KOREAN VINE METHODIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds KOREAN METHODIST CHURCH OF VAN ↗
- Who funds The Good Community Methodist ↗
- Who funds Vancouver Milal Methodist Church ↗
- Who funds JESUS DISCIPLE MOVEMENT SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds The Water of Life Church ↗
- Who funds WYCLIFE Canada Mission ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Coram Deo Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.