Winnipeg, MB · Public foundation
United Way of Winnipeg
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k18 grants · C$62k
- C$10k–50k30 grants · C$917k
- C$50k–250k89 grants · C$11M
- C$250k+36 grants · C$18M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NorWest Co-op Community Health - Winnipeg | C$1,241,767 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,138,410 |
| Manitoba Possible (formerly SMD) * | C$1,091,846 |
| Family Dynamics | C$1,062,390 |
| Supporting Employment and Economic Development | C$994,167 |
| Ma Mawi Wi Chi Itata Centre | C$734,458 |
| YMCA-YWCA of Winnipeg | C$584,809 |
| Canadian Mental Health Association - Manitoba and Winnipeg | C$573,708 |
| Huddle South Central | C$535,442 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$527,814 |
| Huddle Kã Ni Kãnichihk | C$524,314 |
| North End Women's Centre | C$479,402 |
| Community Education Development Association (CEDA) | C$466,804 |
| BGC Winnipeg (formerly Boys and Girls Clubs of Winnipeg) * | C$459,795 |
| A & O: Support Services for Older Adults | C$442,889 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 0% of grant dollars (C$0). The 100% that went abroad (C$182M) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 100% of all-years giving (C$182M)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
178 repeat relationships — 124 still active in FY2024, 54 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2.8M went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FDFamily Dynamics8× · 2017–2024 · C$8.4M
- NCNorWest Co-op Community Health - Winnipeg5× · 2020–2024 · C$5.8M
- MMMa Mawi Wi Chi Itata Centre7× · 2018–2024 · C$4.7M
Funded once
- MPMANITOBA POSSIBLE *one grant, 2020 · C$1.1M
- SSSMD Servicesone grant, 2017 · C$989k
- NCNORWEST COOP COMMUNITY HEALTHone grant, 2019 · C$811k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 405 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.