Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Grand Forks, BC · Charitable organization

Union of Spiritual Communities of Christ

Weekly prayer/spiritual meetings psalm and a cappella singing/choirs for children/youth/adults; cooperate with other spiritual/secular organizations; publication espousing doukhobor spiritual beliefs/activities; traditional memorial services for deceased doukhobor leaders;traditional funerals/weddings; dedicated to preserving…

C$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$842k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOUNDARY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKC$1,000
CASTLEGAR & DISTRICT HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$500
KOOTENAY EMERGENCY RESPONSE PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATIONC$500
KOOTENAY LAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$500
KBRH HEALTH FOUNDATIONC$500
BOUNDARY MUSEUM SOCIETYC$250
TRAIL UNITED CHURCH FOOD BANKC$250
THE COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANKC$250
NELSON SALVATION ARMY FOOD BANKC$250
WHISPERS OF HOPE BENEVOLENCE ASSOCIATIONC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$16k · 7 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +71% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

C$16k
C$725

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+71%

Still filing today

86%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BOUNDARY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +490%
  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA CASTLEGAR KINNAIRD PASTORAL CHARGE
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$4k · revenue +44%
  • KB
    KOOTENAY BOUNDARY REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$1k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • BE
    Boundary Emergency Transition Housing Society
    one grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue -100%
  • BM
    BOUNDARY MUSEUM SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · C$200 · revenue +2%
  • CA
    CANUCKS AUTISM NETWORK SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$100 · revenue +97%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ponoka and District Health Foundation

Assist with purchase of necessary equipment for our health care facilities in ponoka and area

—
2
East Kootenay Foundation for Health

The foundation provides funds to interior health for hospitals clinics long term care homes and community health programs in the east kootenay region to help meet health care equipment and program needs including educational training.

—
3
Squamish Hospital Foundation

Raising funds principally for capital and other needs of the health care institutions in the sea to sky community.

—
4
West Boundary Senior Housing Society

Provider of seniors housing

—
5
Seaforth Community Hospital Foundation

To maintain a fund to enhance or improve patient services for seaforth community hospital. the foundation works with the community to raise funds for major renovations special projects equipment and education for seaforth community…

—
6
Comox Valley Healthcare Foundation

Comox valley healthcare foundation (cvhf) raises funds through a variety of methods to support the general advancement of healthcare and healthcare related services in the comox valley. cvhf provides funding for medical and diagnotic…

—
7
Cowichan District Hospital Foundation

The foundation raises money to finance the purchase of medical and diagnostic equipment for the cowichan district hospital and cairnsmore place long term care facility.

—
8
Coha Foundation

To provide support and funding to the central okanagan hospice association

—
9
Consort Hospital Foundation

Receiving donations and distributing funds to local hospital groups as needs are established.

—
10
Kemptville District Hospital Foundation

To raise funds for the kemptville district hospital for capital equipment renovations and plant expansion.

—
11
Burnaby Hospital and Community Foundation

The foundation raises funds for burnaby hospital through community appeals for gifts bequests donations legacies and endowments. these funds are used to support hospital redevelopment medical equipment staff education capital projects…

—
12
Campbell River & District Food Bank
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kootenay Boundary Regional Hospital and Health Foundation Society and the most unlike its peers is Selkirk College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOUNDARY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SOCIETY — C$7,050 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA CASTLEGAR KINNAIRD PASTORAL CHARGE — C$3,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOOTENAY BOUNDARY REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$1,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASTLEGAR & DISTRICT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$1,200 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetKOOTENAY LAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKOOTENAY EMERGENCY RESPONSE PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoundary Emergency Transition Housing Society — C$300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRAIL UNITED CHURCH FOOD BANK — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNELSON SALVATION ARMY FOOD BANK — C$250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWHISPERS OF HOPE BENEVOLENCE ASSOCIATION — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOUNDARY MUSEUM SOCIETY — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANUCKS AUTISM NETWORK SOCIETY — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSELKIRK COLLEGE FOUNDATION — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENTECOSTAL NEW LIFE ASSEMBLY — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Castlegar & District …The Lions Club of Nel…Bc Government Employe…The Hamber FoundationUnited Way British Co…Vancouver FoundationBenefAction FoundationCHIMP: Charitable Imp…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps CanadonCanadian Online Givin…
Castlegar & District Hospital Auxiliary SocietyBC8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Castlegar & District Hospital Auxiliary Society · The Lions Club of Nelson Charitable Trust · Bc Government Employees Community Services Fund Trust · The Hamber Foundation · United Way British Columbia · Vancouver Foundation · BenefAction Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 119275774:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Union of Spiritual Communities of Christ’s filings →