Saint-Hyacinthe, QC · Charitable organization
Un Refuge sous ses Ailes - A Refuge under his Wings
Promouvoir la foi chrétienne de jésus-christ tel que révélé dans les saintes écritures par l'entremise de séminaires de croisades d'évangélisation d'enseignements.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LES MINISTERES REPARTIR A ZERO | C$1,850 |
| EAGLES WINGS | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EWEAGLES WINGS2× · 2018–2020 · C$2k · revenue +82%
- IMINSPIRATION MINISTRIES2× · 2017–2019 · C$1k · revenue +50%
- PDPAIN DE VIE ÉVANGÉLISATION3× · 2017–2019 · C$550 · revenue +59%
Funded once
- KHKITIMAT HARVEST MINISTRIES INTERNATIONALgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue +51%
- EMEAGLE MOUNTAIN CHURCHgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue +111%
- ESEGLISE SANS FRONTIERESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue +78%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Faire connaitre la parole de dieu
Evangelization
Preach the gospel of our lord jesus christ. the bible being the only and all-sufficient rule of faith and practice conduct evangelistic programs at home and abroad establish programs to propagate the gospel message of salvation promote…
Soutien des mmebres missionnaires à l'étranger
Évangélisation de la communauté
Lieu de culte organismes missionnaires évangélisation
Promouvoir l'evangelisation du christ par les moyens de la predication et diverses autres
Evangelical ministry
Supervision of local churches -supervision of other chapters -evangelism
Lieux de culte congrégaitons paroisses diocèses e1 85% du temps organismes missionnaires évangélisation e2 15% du temps
Organisations religieuses et tenue d'une église évangélique
Organiser administrer et maintenir une église évangélique et proclamer l'évangile de jésus-christ à tous les hommes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eglise Sans Frontieres and the most unlike its peers is L'oeuvre des samaritains. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.