Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

St. Catharines, ON · Charitable organization

Ukrainian Canadian Social Services (St. Catharines) Inc.

The UKRAINIAN CANADIAN SOCIAL SERVICES (ST.

C$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$250
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UKRAINIAN CANADIAN SOCIAL SERVICES CANADAC$3,000
ONE FOUNDATION FOR NIAGARA HEALTH SYSTEMSC$750
UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST GEORGEC$250
SALVATION ARMYC$250
HOTEL DIEU SHAVER HEALTH AND REHAB FNDC$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$46k · 8 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

C$46k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-9%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    Ukranian Canadian Social Services of Canada Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +141%
  • OF
    ONE FOUNDATION FOR NICAGARA HEALTH SYSTEM
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue ×17
  • HD
    HOTEL DIEU SHAVER HEALTH AND REHAB FND
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CU
    CANADA UKRAINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue -80%
  • SA
    Salvation Army
    one grant, 2018 · C$500
  • NO
    NATIVITY OF THE HOLY MOTHER OF GOD UCC
    one grant, 2023 · C$300

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ukrainian Catholic Parish of St Nicholas
—
2
Ukrainian Catholic Holy Ghost Church

Providing services for the parishioners and public at large

—
3
St Nicholas Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
4
St Mary's Ukrainian Catholic Church

To provide a place of worship and maintain the church

—
5
St Mary's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
6
St Michael's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
7
Ukrainian Senior Citizens Home of St John

Provide funding for ukrainian orthodox faith and ukrainian language and culture in canada

—
8
St Mary's Church

Our charity provides services of the Ukrainian Catholic Church to the members of the Parish and the community to provide the advancement of Ukrainian Catholic religious worship, instruction and ministry.

—
9
The Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Blessed Trinity At Weyburn

Pastoral care worship services visits to nursing homes nad hospitals community events

—
10
St. Joseph's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
11
Ukrainian Catholic Parish of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus

The current parish supported church expenses maintenance priest's salary living allowance social benefits

—
12
St. Nicholas Ukrainian Catholic Church

Church services

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian Canadian Social Services Inc. of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Hotel Dieu Shaver Health and Rehabilitation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUkranian Canadian Social Services of Canada Inc — C$16,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetST. GEORGE UKR. ORTHODOX CHURCH RESTORATION — C$12,250 over 8y, 16% of budgetONE FOUNDATION FOR NICAGARA HEALTH SYSTEM — C$5,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOTEL DIEU SHAVER HEALTH AND REHAB FND — C$3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$2,750 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE — C$2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTS CYRIL & METHODIUS CHURCH — C$2,250 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetST JOHN THE THEOLOGIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH — C$1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCANADA UKRAINE FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Niagara Community Fou…Strategic Charitable …My Tribute Gift Found…Charities Aid Foundat…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Niagara Community Foundation Fondation Communautaire de NiagaraON9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Niagara Community Foundation Fondation Communautaire de Niagara · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 830950911:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ukrainian Canadian Social Services (St. Catharines)’s filings →