North York, ON · Private foundation
Tzidkas Yisorel
The organization intends to operate as a charitable foundation whose purpose is primarily to make donations to qualified donees.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under C$10k12 grants · C$29k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$41k
- C$50k–250k2 grants · C$237k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEIS MEIR | C$125,387 |
| JHF | C$111,886 |
| KOL YAAKOV | C$30,600 |
| KAV SHALOM | C$10,250 |
| NACHLAS ZVI | C$6,680 |
| BNOS CHAYA | C$5,000 |
| CFO YAD ELIEZER | C$4,000 |
| BNOS BEIS YAAKOV | C$3,000 |
| ZICHRON BINYAMIN | C$2,751 |
| BOBOV | C$1,850 |
| KOLLEL AVREICHIM | C$1,800 |
| BNEI TZION | C$1,753 |
| BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | C$1,600 |
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU | C$250 |
| KOLLEL DAF YOMI | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -2% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$134k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- JJHF2× · 2022–2023 · C$141k · revenue +27%
- KSKAV SHALOM2× · 2022–2023 · C$12k · revenue ×20
- BBBNOS BEIS YAAKOV2× · 2022–2023 · C$7k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- RMRABBI MEIR BAL HANESone grant, 2022 · C$30k · revenue +6%
- MMEOROTHone grant, 2022 · C$10k
- TCTORONTO CHESED FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue -52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
Support of jewish education and institutions
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
The charity maintained an elementary school for the teaching of the moral and religious principles of the jewish orthodox faith
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
The organization has been set up to provide religious education.
Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.
The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.
Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.
Issued scholarships for religious education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Mishkan Yosef and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JHF ↗
- Who funds BEIS MEIR ↗
- Who funds KOL YAAKOV ↗
- Who funds RABBI MEIR BAL HANES ↗
- Who funds NACHLAS ZVI ↗
- Who funds KAV SHALOM ↗
- Who funds MEOROTH ↗
- Who funds CFO YAD ELIEZER ↗
- Who funds BNOS BEIS YAAKOV ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL AVREICHIM ↗
- Who funds BNOS CHAYA ↗
- Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON BINYAMIN ↗
- Who funds TORONTO CHESED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BNEI TZION ↗
- Who funds BOBOV ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI BRESLOV ↗
- Who funds IATHS ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OHR HAMEIR ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL DAF YOMI ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAS MISHKAN YOSEF ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · The M & J Charitable Trust · Heller Family Charity · The Mesora Charitable Foundation · The Rothschild Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.