Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Moose Jaw, SK · Charitable organization

Twin Lakes Ranch Ministries Inc

The organizations purpose is to promote christianity by holding events such as worship services and student rodeo camps in the local community.

C$10k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
4
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$832
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$697k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Almond Tree Ministries IncC$3,000
Billye Brim MinistriesC$1,600
Breakthrough MinistriesC$1,000
BPEAC$850
Ken Copeland MinistriesC$832
Jerry Savelle Ministries IncC$800
Eagle World Wild MinistriesC$600
Partnership MinistriesC$600
Dominion Broadcasting SocietyC$300
V-Kol MinistriesC$300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$21k · 8 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

C$21k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    Almond Tree Ministries Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$9k · revenue +35%
  • B
    BPEA
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +37%
  • VM
    V-Kol Ministries
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • KV
    Kelowna Victory Life Fellowship
    one grant, 2017 · C$670 · revenue -63%
  • SH
    Souls Harbourgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$343 · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldwide Revival Ministries

Evangelical ministry

—
2
Kingdom Culture Ministries

Kingdom culture ministries is an international ministry that is dedicated to bringing the delivering power of jesus christ throughout north america and abroad. to that end ministry personnel preached the gospel in churches conferences &…

—
3
Kingdom Ministries

To gather christians for prayer and teachings through conferences. the ministry also provides individual with personal ministry.

—
4
Taking the Gospel Ministries

Publishing missionary organizations evangelism social outreach religious fellowship

—
5
Bridges Beyond International Ministries

Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.

—
6
Great Commission Media Ministries

Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns

—
7
Divine Freedom International Ministry

Evangelization

—
8
Speak Life Global

To encourage teach and disciple the christian church around the world.

—
9
Liberty International Ministries Inc.

Conduct gospel outreaches provide study materials for educational discipleship prayer and bible teaching

—
10
Gateway Ministries International

(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching

—
11
John and Carol Arnott Ministries

The ministry mission is spreading the propagation of the gospel

—
12
Lifestream Ministries International Inc

Bible and religious teaching mentoring programs study materials seminars and workshops

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kelowna Victory Life Fellowship Inc and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough Ministries International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAlmond Tree Ministries Inc — C$8,882 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetKen Copeland Misistries — C$4,919 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBillye Brim Ministries — C$1,600 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBPEA — C$1,550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJerry Savelle Ministries Inc — C$1,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetV-Kol Ministries — C$1,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEagle World Wild Ministries — C$1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPartnership Ministries — C$1,200 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDominion Broadcasting Society — C$1,100 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBreakthrough Ministries — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKelowna Victory Life Fellowship — C$670 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSouls Harbour — C$343 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Covenant Ministri…Canadian National Chr…Solid Rock Community …Kenneth Copeland Mini…Link Charity Canada I…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
New Covenant MinistriesNS9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Covenant Ministries · Canadian National Christian Foundation · Solid Rock Community Church Inc. · Kenneth Copeland Ministries Canada · Link Charity Canada Inc · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 119122331:2018-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Twin Lakes Ranch Ministries’ filings →