Ottawa, ON · Private foundation
Trust Under the Will of Bernard Lacroix
To invest the capital of the estate for 25 years paying 15% of the net income annually to each of: children's hospital of eastern ontario shepherds of good hope ottawa food bank ottawa snowsuit fund children's wish foundation and 25% to foster parents plan of canada.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Plan International Canada | C$211,292 |
| Childrens Wish Foundation | C$126,775 |
| Ottawa Snowsuit Fund | C$126,775 |
| Childrens Hospital of Eastern Ontario | C$126,775 |
| Shepherds of Good Hope | C$126,775 |
| Ottawa Food Bank | C$126,775 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PIPlan International Canada3× · 2017–2019 · C$220k · revenue +13%
- CHChildrens Hospital of Eastern Ontario3× · 2017–2019 · C$132k · revenue +114%
- SOShepherds of Good Hope3× · 2017–2019 · C$132k · revenue +99%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.