Skip to content

Thetford Mines, QC · Charitable organization

Trust de Charité Du Club Rotary de Thetford Mines

Campagne de pommes participation à des activités bénévoles prêts d'équipements dans divers organismes aide aux handicapés aide aux pauvres aide aux enfants démunis rotacrabe petits déjeuners dans les écoles primaires

C$90k
Granted FY2023
19
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k17 grants · C$60k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$30k
C$4,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BANQUE ALIMENTAIRE LA VIGNEC$20,000
CENTRE DE STIMULATION L'INTERCOMC$10,000
MESURES ALTERNATIVES JEUNESSE FRONTENACC$9,925
INTERVALLEC$8,000
ÉCOLE ST-LOUIS THETFORD MINESC$7,000
CENTRE DORÉMY DES APPALACHESC$6,000
CENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE DES APPALACHESC$5,550
GROUPE D'ENTRAIDE CANCER ET VIEC$5,000
COMMISSION SCOLAIRE DES APPALACHESC$4,000
Individual grant recipientC$4,000
Individual grant recipientC$3,812
ASSOCIATION HLM TMC$3,000
Individual grant recipientC$2,000
DISTRICT 7790C$800
FONDATION CLUB ROTARY QUÉBECC$550
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 67% of grant dollars (C$166k). The 33% that went abroad (C$81k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 33% of all-years giving (C$81k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$152k · 12 repeat orgsC$95k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

C$152k
C$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+115%

Still filing today

58%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BANQUE ALIMENTAIRE LA VIGNE
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$50k · revenue +129%
  • CD
    CENTRE DOMRÉMY DES APPALACHES
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$29k · revenue +122%
  • CD
    CENTRE DE STIMULATION L'INTERCOM
    3× · 2017–2023 · C$24k · revenue +264%

Funded once

  • MF
    MAISON FIN DE VIE THETFORD
    one grant, 2022 · C$28k
  • FP
    FONDATION PAULINE GRENIER
    one grant, 2022 · C$18k
  • RD
    REGROUPEMENT DES PERSONNES HANDICAPÉES PHYSIQUE DE LA RÉGIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$6k · revenue +115%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centre de Readaptation en deficience intellectuelle et en troubles envahissants du développement de l'estrie
—
2
Centre de pédiatrie sociale de Lévis

Permettre aux enfants de milieu défavorisés de se développer selon leur plein potentiel.

—
3
La ChacuniÈRe

Développer logement social supervisé pour personnes déficience intellectuelle

—
4
Centre de pédiatrie sociale Coeur des Laurentides

Accueillir et accompagner les enfants de 0 à 16 ans évoluant en contexte de vulnérabilité afin de les aider à développer leur plein potentiel leur santé physique ainsi que leur bien-etre dans le respect de la convention rélative aux droits…

—
5
Maison de répit l'Intermède

Offrir de l'hébergement et des activités à la clientèle (déficience intellectuelle et trouble envahissant du développement); offrir du répit aux parents des usagers; offrirécoute et intervention aux parents et aux usagers; solliciter des…

—
6
Première Ressource aide aux parents

Programme de soutient pour les parents dans l'acquisition et le maintien de leurs compétences parentales afin d'offrir aux enfants un milieu familial favorable à leur développement.

—
7
Espace Chaudiere-Appalaches

Le programme espace: prévenir la violence et habiliter les enfants à se protéger contre toute forme d'agression: verbale physique psychologique sexuelle qu'il s'agisse de négligence ou encore d'intimidation

—
8
C a P Accueil Jeunesse

Promouvoir les loisirs sans auprès des jeunes et de les amener à découvrir et développer leurs talents.

—
9
Centre De Stimulation L'envol

Offre des services de stimulation precoce pour les enfants qui presentent un trouble de developpement 0 et 5 ans; - offrir du support aux parents concernes (service de garde adapte); - offrir des ateliers des conferences et de la formation…

—
10
Centre des Enfants

Aide alimentaire vestimentaire aux devoirs et leçons. support parental activité de developpement et familiale. médecine sociale pédiatrique

—
11
La Libellule pour les Personnes Vivant avec une Déficience Intellectuelle et leurs Proches

Soutenir les personnes vivant avec un déficience intellectuelle dans leur développement. faire la promotion de leurs intérêts et oeuvrer à l'amélioration de leurs conditions de vie.

—
12
Centre de réussite éducative pour enfants La-le-li

Son objectif est d'offrir de services de soutien à l'apprentissage personnalisé aux enfants du primaire qui éprouvent des difficultés à l'école

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Domremy Des Appalaches Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Ligue Des Cadets De L'air Du Canada (QuÉBec Et VallÉE De L'outaouais) Air Cadet League of Canada (QuÉBec and VallÉE De Loutaouais). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBANQUE ALIMENTAIRE LA VIGNE — C$50,000 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetCENTRE DOMRÉMY DES APPALACHES — C$29,300 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRE DE STIMULATION L'INTERCOM — C$23,700 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetCENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE DES APPALACHES — C$13,550 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetGROUPE D'ENTRAIDE CANCER ET VIE — C$11,700 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetREGROUPEMENT DES PERSONNES HANDICAPÉES PHYSIQUE DE LA RÉGION — C$6,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFONDATION CLUB ROTARY QUÉBEC — C$2,050 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetFONDATION RENAISSANCE — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION C.E.D. INC. — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BANQUE ALIMENTAIRE LA VIGNE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE DOMRÉMY DES APPALACHES ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE DE STIMULATION L'INTERCOM ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE DES APPALACHES ↗
  • Who funds GROUPE D'ENTRAIDE CANCER ET VIE ↗
  • Who funds REGROUPEMENT DES PERSONNES HANDICAPÉES PHYSIQUE DE LA RÉGION ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION CLUB ROTARY QUÉBEC ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION RENAISSANCE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION C.E.D. INC. ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Donat GrenierQC11.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Donat Grenier · FONDATION Germaine et Fernand Bernard · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Comité des oeuvres charitables du conseil Black Lake 5167-28 · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 119271914:2023-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Trust de Charité Du Club Rotary de Thetford Mines’ filings →