Nanaimo, BC · Charitable organization
Trinity United Church Pastoral Charge
Conduct weekly worship services offer pastroal care grief support group activities ; educate through bible study sunday school ; provide financial support to mission + service loave & fishes outreach programs
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - MISSION AND SERVICE | C$3,880 |
| LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | C$2,353 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUnited Church - Mission & Service6× · 2018–2024 · C$32k · revenue +28%
- LFLOAVES & FISHES4× · 2018–2023 · C$16k
- ATANGEL TREE4× · 2019–2022 · C$726
Funded once
- UCUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - MISSION SERVICEone grant, 2019 · C$7k
- LFLOAVES + FISHESone grant, 2022 · C$4k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.