Skip to content

Renfrew, ON · Charitable organization

Trinity-St Andrew's United Church

Weekly worship - online & in person rainbow worship services geared to lgbtq+ in community community outreach - monthly freewill luncheon

C$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$28k
C$5,919
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CHRUCH OF CANADAC$17,938
HOSPICE RENFREWC$10,000
CAMP LAU-RENC$5,919
CANADIAN FOOD GRAINS BANKC$3,260
RENFREW FOOD BANKC$1,112
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$250k · 7 repeat orgsC$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

C$250k
C$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-8%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church of Canada M&S
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$194k · revenue +22%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FOOD GRANS BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$19k · revenue +103%
  • RF
    RENFREW FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +277%

Funded once

  • GL
    Golden Lake Camp
    one grant, 2017 · C$15k · revenue -8%
  • CL
    CAMP LAU-REN
    one grant, 2020 · C$2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Renfrew County United Way

To identify and address the needs of our communities by organizing the resources of community members to help one another.

—
2
Medair Canada

1. Afghanistan: We identified and treated acute malnutrition in children under five in Kandahar Province. 2. Lebanon: We provided clean drinking water to Syrian Refugees living in the informal settlements in the Bekaa valley. 3. Emergency…

—
3
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
4
Camp Canak Inc.

Centre de repis et d'hebergement

—
5
Lac La Ronge Food Bank Inc.

Operate as a food bank

—
6
Regional Food Distribution Association of Northwestern Ontario

To secure and distribute emergency food to meet the needs in northwestern ontario

—
7
Renfrew Victoria Hospital

Public hospital in ontario

—
8
Tim Horton Children's Foundation Inc.

The Tim Horton Children's Foundation is committed to empowering youth from low-income households through Tim Horton camp experiences. Camp experiences are intentionally designed to foster the strengths within youth and provide…

—
9
Regina & District Food Bank Inc.

Food insecurity remains a critical health issue in Regina affecting over 25 000 people daily. The Regina Food Bank has evolved since 1982 from offering short-term relief to becoming an essential partner in combating hunger in our…

—
10
International Development Research Centre

Created by Parliament in 1970 IDRC has been committed in supporting research in developing countries undertaken by the people of those countries for their own development. IDRC has five areas of focus: Climate-Resilient Food Systems Global…

—
11
Islamic Relief - Ir Canada

Islamic Relief Canada carries out humanitarian and development programs in over 30 countries. Programs include: • Livelihoods focused on climate-adaptive support and/or economic empowerment; • Health including water sanitation and hygiene…

—
12
Canadian Centre for Food and Ecology
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Foodgrains Bank Association Inc/Association De La Banque Canadienne De Grains Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Camp Lau-Ren. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church of Canada M&S — C$193,873 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FOOD GRANS BANK — C$19,106 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGolden Lake Camp — C$15,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$11,643 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE RENFREW — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRENFREW FOOD BANK — C$9,819 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCamp Lau-ren — C$3,999 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetRENFREW COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES (CPAN) — C$2,619 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Church of Canada M&S ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN FOOD GRANS BANK ↗
  • Who funds Golden Lake Camp ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE RENFREW ↗
  • Who funds RENFREW FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Camp Lau-ren ↗
  • Who funds RENFREW COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES (CPAN) ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Admaston Pastoral ChargeON8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Admaston Pastoral Charge · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119270718:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Trinity-St Andrew's United Church’s filings →