Meadowvale, NS · Charitable organization
Trinity Pentecostal Church
Hold Worship Services Regularly Have Regular Prayer Meetings Provide Ministry Programs for Children and Youth Provide Small Group Bible Studies Fellowship Programs Distribute Funds to Qualified Donees for Missions and Outreach Programs
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$7k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Maritime District PAOC | C$13,001 |
| ERDO | C$2,960 |
| Upper Room Foodbank | C$2,554 |
| Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada | C$909 |
| Evangeline Pentecostal Camp | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- URUPPER ROOM FOODBANK8× · 2017–2024 · C$21k · revenue +61%
- EERDO4× · 2021–2024 · C$7k · revenue +7%
- HWHis Word for His People Association5× · 2017–2021 · C$7k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- KAKingsway Assembleyone grant, 2019 · C$169 · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missions support and religious publishing distribution
The promotion of christianity through the publication of bible reading materials and child evangelism programs.
Publishing and distributing books that advance the Christian faith
Transforming lives through god's word through bible translation bible publishing and bible engagement programs throughout canada and the world.
Radio program book/resource distribution conference ministry
Publishing a bible teaching magazine bi-monthly
Assisting the local church in canada and asia by providing literature information and training.
Church ministry evangelism bible training book room missionary work
Distribution and writing of sunday school material and school curricula.
Evangelical ministry
Programs directed at supporting the christian church as follows: 1) printing and distributing bibles and other religious materials to churches 2) providing basic necessities for christian churches and ministries such as food and clothing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ShareWord Global Canada and the most unlike its peers is Upper Room Food Bank Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Maritime District PAOC ↗
- Who funds UPPER ROOM FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds ERDO ↗
- Who funds His Word for His People Association ↗
- Who funds The Gideons International in Canada ↗
- Who funds Evangeline Pentecostal Camp ↗
- Who funds World Misionary Press ↗
- Who funds Kingsway Assembley ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge Atlantic ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.