Aylmer Ontario, ON · Charitable organization
Trinity Anglican Church
Place or worship: congregation parish diocese of huron welcoming to anyone who wishes to join us in worship.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INCORPORATED SYNOD OF DIOCESE OF HURON | C$8,136 |
| ANGLICAN FOUNDATION OF CANADA | C$500 |
| HARVEST HANDS | C$250 |
| ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 81 | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +104% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ISINCORPORATED SYNOD OF DIOCESE OF HURON5× · 2018–2023 · C$53k
- EEEAST ELGIN COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM7× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +104%
- PWPRIMATES WORLD RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT FUND2× · 2020–2023 · C$550 · revenue -8%
Funded once
- ISIncorporated Synod of Diocese of Huronone grant, 2017 · C$15k
- PWPRIMATE'S WORLD RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT FUNDone grant, 2022 · C$1k
- FCFarmtown Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$468 · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing Funding for Doulas for Pregnancies where support is needed but could not otherwise be afforded.
The organization provides support to clergy for compassionate reasons.
The main focus of hope2offer foundation is supporting evangelism for the purpose of advancing the christian religion. support will be mainly given to through hope2offer ministries [a related charity] who is involved with the feeding of the…
Ongoing programs provide grants to qualified donees to support initiatives that alleviate poverty by providing housing and food security solutions.
The anglican diocese of ontario foundation supports innovative approaches to the building of god's kingdom through christian education service and a bold celebration of the anglican tradition. the foundation provides funding to revitalize…
The main focus of hope2offer ministries is evangelism for the purpose of advancing the christian religion. hope2offer ministries is involved with the feeding of the hungry both physically and spiritually with the gospel of jesus christ and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Anglican Foundation of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Courage for Freedom. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INCORPORATED SYNOD OF DIOCESE OF HURON ↗
- Who funds EAST ELGIN COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds PRIMATES WORLD RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds ANGLICAN FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds Farmtown Canada ↗
- Who funds HARVEST HANDS ↗
- Who funds ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 81 ↗
- Who funds Fresh Start Maternity Support ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Elgin-St. Thomas Community Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.