Thornhill, ON · Charitable organization
Toronto Chapter Spebsqsa
TORONTO CHAPTER SPEBSQSA trades as toronto northern lights (tnl).
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF CHAPTERS OF SPEBSQSA | C$250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -7% since the first grant, against -71% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CDCONTARIO DISTRICT ASSOCIATION OF CHAPTERS SPEBSQSA4× · 2017–2022 · C$1k · revenue -15%
- CCCOMMUNITY CARE-ST. CATHARINES AND THOROLD2× · 2018–2020 · C$430 · revenue +37%
- SCSing Canada Harmony Scholarship Fund2× · 2018–2019 · C$155 · revenue -7%
Funded once
- SJST JOHN THE EVANGELIST COUNCIL NO 4895 CHARITABLE TRUSTone grant, 2018 · C$270 · revenue -83%
- JFJewels For Jesus Mission inc.graduatedone grant, 2017 · C$150 · revenue +47%
- YSYOUNG SIGNERS ONTARIO CANADAone grant, 2019 · C$90 · revenue -71%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONTARIO DISTRICT ASSOCIATION OF CHAPTERS SPEBSQSA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE-ST. CATHARINES AND THOROLD ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST COUNCIL NO 4895 CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds Sing Canada Harmony Scholarship Fund ↗
- Who funds Jewels For Jesus Mission inc. ↗
- Who funds YOUNG SIGNERS ONTARIO CANADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.