Englehart, ON · Charitable organization
Tomstown Presbyterian Church
Monthly worship monthly community craft days student bursaries local mission/emergency assistance
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CANADA | C$147 |
| SICK KIDS FOUNDATION | C$100 |
| TERRY FOX FOUNDATION | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SKSick Kids Foundation4× · 2017–2020 · C$760 · revenue +30%
- CDCochrane & District Detox Centre4× · 2017–2021 · C$750 · revenue +30%
- SKSUDBURY KINSMEN FAMILY CENTRE FOUNDATION: HOUSE OF5× · 2017–2021 · C$750 · revenue +37%
Funded once
- HMHILLARDTON MARSH EDUC'N & RESEARCH CENTERone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue -28%
- EAENGLEHART & AREA FOOD BANKone grant, 2020 · C$150
- CDCOCHRANE DETOX CENTERone grant, 2018 · C$150
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Raise funds for improvement of health care services in the area served by south huron hospital
acute care hospital
Support on going research programs for the hospital for sick children and other eye research practice
General community hospital
Provide grants and gifts of equipment to the oakville site of halton healthcare services corporation
Bluewater Health Foundation raises funds for the hospital group known as Bluewater Health. These funds are spent on capital projects and to facilitate the acquisition of leading edge equipment and technology and the provision of programs…
Donating to local hospital
Grant to health care facility
Raise manage and distribute funds in support of our hospitals and cancer centre for patient care research education equipment renovations and capital expenditures.
Providing Funding For Local Hospital Long Term Residential Health Care and Support Of Other Health Care Programs.
Fund raised are for designated and capital projects and patient equipment for the brant community healthcare system brantford general hospital and the willett hospital sites
Erie shores health foundation raises capital for new equipment and building infrastructure for erie shores healthcare; capital campaigns currently being supported include diagnostic imaging mri equipment and urology. erie shores health…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Quality Canada and the most unlike its peers is Rotary Club of Englehart Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Presbyterian Church in Canada (Presbyterians Sharing PWS&D) ↗
- Who funds Sick Kids Foundation ↗
- Who funds Cochrane & District Detox Centre ↗
- Who funds SUDBURY KINSMEN FAMILY CENTRE FOUNDATION: HOUSE OF ↗
- Who funds ENGLEHART ROTARY CHRISTMAS BASKETS ↗
- Who funds PAVILLION WOMENS' CENTRE ↗
- Who funds TEMISKAMING HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
- Who funds HILLARDTON MARSH EDUC'N & RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds ENGLEHART & AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds TERRY FOX RUN ↗
- Who funds HOPE & HEALING INTERNATION ↗
- Who funds THE WOBIKON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMP QUALITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Temiskaming Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.