Tofield, AB · Charitable organization
Tofield United Church
Mission and Service Fund Community Fund ICPM lunch program Assist with religious studies and guidance Tofield/Ryley Food Bank Beaver County Victim Services FCSS Outreach to Houseless in Edmonton
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mission and Service Fund United Church of Canada | C$8,465 |
| Tofield Ryley and Area Food Bank Society | C$465 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUnited Church of Canada4× · 2017–2021 · C$22k
- MAMission and Service Fund United Church of Canada2× · 2023–2024 · C$17k · revenue +1%
- TRTofield Ryley and Area Food Bank Society2× · 2022–2024 · C$540 · revenue +56%
Funded once
- UCUnited Church of Canada Mission and Service Fundone grant, 2022 · C$8k
- ICInner City Pastoral Ministryone grant, 2021 · C$838
- TGThe Governors of the University of Albertaone grant, 2022 · C$150
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.