Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Vancouver, BC · Public foundation

Timothy Foundation

We made gifts to qualified donees

C$10k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$890k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARMONY FOUNDATIONC$10,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$831k · 3 repeat orgsC$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +274% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
24

Total granted

C$831k
C$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+274%
0%

Still filing today

67%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • VV
    Virtual Vancouver Foundation
    2× · 2018–2020 · C$700k · revenue -99%
  • IC
    Imperial College of Scotland
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$92k
  • CC
    CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation
    2× · 2017–2021 · C$38k · revenue +274%

Funded once

  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · C$632k
  • FF
    Foundation for Public Good
    one grant, 2017 · C$150k · revenue -100%
  • VF
    VANCHORVERVE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · C$150k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
What If Foundation

Making gifts to qualified donees

—
2
Fortius Foundation

Making gifts to qualified donees

—
3
Global View Foundation

We made gifts to qualified donees

—
4
Celebrate Foundation

Making donations to qualified donees

—
5
Building Benevolence in a Covid World Foundation

Making gifts to qualified donees

—
6
Humanitas Foundation

Gifting to qualified donees

—
7
Give a Little Foundation

It made gifts to qualified donees.

—
8
Loyalty Foundation

Making gifts to qualified donees.

—
9
Device Foundation

We make gifts to qualified donees

—
10
Zawadi Foundation

We make gifts to qualified donees

—
11
Mhg Foundation

Gifts to qualified donees

—
12
The Jawl Foundation

Making gifts to qualified donees

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harmony Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bridge to Right Way. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/24
Grantees still filing
11/24
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVirtual Vancouver Foundation — C$700,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetFoundation for Public Good — C$150,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetVANCHORVERVE FOUNDATION — C$150,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCHARITY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — C$40,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetCHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation — C$38,240 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART FOR AFRICA (CANADA) — C$26,692 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetBRIDGE TO SOMEWHERE FOUNDATION — C$25,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetBeing Grateful Foundation — C$25,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetREVELATION FOUNDATION — C$15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOLARI FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetELDERS IN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetSculpture Art Academy — C$10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetVANCOUVER ACTOR PROJECT FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetHARMONY FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetHELP CHANGE MY CITY SOCIAL YOUTH TRUST SOCIETY — C$10,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetUMOJA OPERATION COMPASSION SOCIETY — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREAT CHARITY — C$2,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Almoner FoundationVanchorverve Foundati…Yunnan FoundationCHIMP: Charitable Imp…Vancouver FoundationPayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…
Almoner FoundationBC12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Almoner Foundation · Vanchorverve Foundation · Yunnan Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Vancouver Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-09-08, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 832200463:2022-09-08 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Timothy’s filings →