Skip to content

Treherne, MB · Public foundation

Tiger Hills Community Foundation Inc.

We are seeking ongoing donations to this foundation.

C$86k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k13 grants · C$50k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$36k
C$4,800
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TREHERNE AQUATIC CENTREC$13,500
DELAHUNT GOLF & COUNTRY CLUBC$11,600
TREHERNE COLLEGIATEC$11,010
TREHERNE FIRE DEPARTMENTC$9,500
TIGER HILLS HEALTH CENTREC$6,489
TREHERNE MUSEUMC$5,798
TREHERNE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$5,100
TREHERNE MINOR ATHLETICC$4,800
TREHERNE AG SOCIETYC$4,600
MCCREERY SCHOOL HERITAGE COMMITTEEC$3,520
SHADY LANE SCHOOLC$2,400
TREHERNE CURLING CLUBC$2,400
UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBAC$2,000
TREHERNE MARATHONC$1,800
RATHWELL HALLC$1,124
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$461k · 13 repeat orgsC$45k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

C$461k
C$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+30%

Still filing today

77%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TREHERNE AQAUTIC CENTRE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$87k · revenue +6% · 28% of their budget
  • TC
    TREHERNE COLLEGIATE
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$50k · revenue +9%
  • TH
    TIGER HILLS HEALTH CENTRE
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$48k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • TP
    Treherne Pastoral Charge
    one grant, 2017 · C$20k · revenue -48%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k
  • TH
    Tiger Hills Health Centre
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Treherne and Area Donor's Choice
—
2
Tiger Hills Transit Inc.

To provide transportation opportunities to residents and individuals who are mobility disadvantaged

—
3
Pierceland Recreation Association

Operating + maintaining the community hall arena sports grounds and other recreational programs.

—
4
Prairie North Regional Health Authority

The Regional Health Authority provides comprehensive health services including: acute care, long term care, primary health, home care, community/public health, mental health, addiction services, emergency services and health promotion and…

—
5
Prairie View Lodge

Long term care facility

—
6
Prairie River Seniors Incorporated

The senior's provides the opportunity for various community functions as well as fundraisers and private function ie memorials teas/ birthday parties/ christmas parties etc

—
7
Prairie Places Inc.

Helps mentally challenged individuals maintain homes within the community

—
8
Prairie Wind Estate Inc.

Providing retirement living for seniors with necessary care in the southwest saskatchewan area.

—
9
The Sports Recreation Association of Tignish

Operation of a not-for-profit recreational facility and arena for the tignish area of pei.

—
10
Prairie Pioneers Club

Operation of a seniors activity centre: cards line dancing table pool easy exercise floor curl bocce ball mexican train pie days pot luck suppers

—
11
Prairie Animal Assistance Corp.

Rescue/rehabilitate special-needs animals at our animal sanctuary. educate people about positive training and animal welfare. help people with special needs- animal - assisted therapy / assistance animals.

—
12
Tisdale Tiny Tornadoes Daycare Inc.

Operating a licensed daycare for children in the Tisdale area

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Treherne Friendship Centre Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Rathwell Skating Rink Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTREHERNE AQAUTIC CENTRE — C$86,698 over 8y, 28% of budgetTREHERNE COLLEGIATE — C$50,425 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTIGER HILLS HEALTH CENTRE — C$47,989 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER HILLS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE — C$26,174 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTreherne Pastoral Charge — C$20,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTREHERNE FRIENDSHIP CENTRE — C$12,037 over 4y, 30% of budgetTREHERNE AG SOCIETY — C$4,600 over 1y, 49% of budgetGREEN PRAIRIE LODGE — C$3,862 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetMILES FOR SENIORS — C$3,235 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTIGER HILLS ARTS ASSOCIATION INC — C$2,565 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetRATHWELL SKATING RINK — C$1,911 over 4y, 20% of budgetSTARS AIR AMBULANCE FOUNDATION — C$1,620 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREHERNE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — C$1,465 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TREHERNE AQAUTIC CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds TREHERNE COLLEGIATE ↗
  • Who funds TIGER HILLS HEALTH CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds TIGER HILLS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds Treherne Pastoral Charge ↗
  • Who funds TREHERNE FRIENDSHIP CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds TREHERNE AG SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GREEN PRAIRIE LODGE ↗
  • Who funds MILES FOR SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds TIGER HILLS ARTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RATHWELL SKATING RINK ↗
  • Who funds STARS AIR AMBULANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TREHERNE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Treherne and Area Donor's ChoiceMB8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Treherne and Area Donor's Choice · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-09-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 893253583:2024-09-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Tiger Hills’ filings →