Treherne, MB · Public foundation
Tiger Hills Community Foundation Inc.
We are seeking ongoing donations to this foundation.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k13 grants · C$50k
- C$10k–50k3 grants · C$36k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TREHERNE AQUATIC CENTRE | C$13,500 |
| DELAHUNT GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB | C$11,600 |
| TREHERNE COLLEGIATE | C$11,010 |
| TREHERNE FIRE DEPARTMENT | C$9,500 |
| TIGER HILLS HEALTH CENTRE | C$6,489 |
| TREHERNE MUSEUM | C$5,798 |
| TREHERNE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | C$5,100 |
| TREHERNE MINOR ATHLETIC | C$4,800 |
| TREHERNE AG SOCIETY | C$4,600 |
| MCCREERY SCHOOL HERITAGE COMMITTEE | C$3,520 |
| SHADY LANE SCHOOL | C$2,400 |
| TREHERNE CURLING CLUB | C$2,400 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA | C$2,000 |
| TREHERNE MARATHON | C$1,800 |
| RATHWELL HALL | C$1,124 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TATREHERNE AQAUTIC CENTRE8× · 2017–2024 · C$87k · revenue +6% · 28% of their budget
- TCTREHERNE COLLEGIATE7× · 2018–2024 · C$50k · revenue +9%
- THTIGER HILLS HEALTH CENTRE6× · 2019–2024 · C$48k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- TPTreherne Pastoral Chargeone grant, 2017 · C$20k · revenue -48%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · C$5k
- THTiger Hills Health Centreone grant, 2017 · C$5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide transportation opportunities to residents and individuals who are mobility disadvantaged
Operating + maintaining the community hall arena sports grounds and other recreational programs.
The Regional Health Authority provides comprehensive health services including: acute care, long term care, primary health, home care, community/public health, mental health, addiction services, emergency services and health promotion and…
Long term care facility
The senior's provides the opportunity for various community functions as well as fundraisers and private function ie memorials teas/ birthday parties/ christmas parties etc
Helps mentally challenged individuals maintain homes within the community
Providing retirement living for seniors with necessary care in the southwest saskatchewan area.
Operation of a not-for-profit recreational facility and arena for the tignish area of pei.
Operation of a seniors activity centre: cards line dancing table pool easy exercise floor curl bocce ball mexican train pie days pot luck suppers
Rescue/rehabilitate special-needs animals at our animal sanctuary. educate people about positive training and animal welfare. help people with special needs- animal - assisted therapy / assistance animals.
Operating a licensed daycare for children in the Tisdale area
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Treherne Friendship Centre Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Rathwell Skating Rink Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TREHERNE AQAUTIC CENTRE ↗
- Who funds TREHERNE COLLEGIATE ↗
- Who funds TIGER HILLS HEALTH CENTRE ↗
- Who funds TIGER HILLS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds Treherne Pastoral Charge ↗
- Who funds TREHERNE FRIENDSHIP CENTRE ↗
- Who funds TREHERNE AG SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GREEN PRAIRIE LODGE ↗
- Who funds MILES FOR SENIORS ↗
- Who funds TIGER HILLS ARTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds RATHWELL SKATING RINK ↗
- Who funds STARS AIR AMBULANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TREHERNE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Treherne and Area Donor's Choice · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.