Thorold, ON · Charitable organization
Thorold South Gospel Chapel
Advancement of religion via congregational meetings sunday school children's meetings youth meetings and community gospel outreach meetings.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NIAGARA SHORTHILLS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES | C$3,600 |
| CAMP LI-LO-LI CANADA | C$1,575 |
| OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES CANADA | C$200 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NSNIAGRA SHORTHILLS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · C$24k · revenue +37%
- ECETHNOS CANADA7× · 2017–2023 · C$10k · revenue +21%
- MCMSC CANADA5× · 2017–2021 · C$6k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- HHHAMILTON HEATH SCIENCESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +200%
- SSCOTTLEAone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +0%
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Transforming lives through god's word through bible translation bible publishing and bible engagement programs throughout canada and the world.
Distribution and writing of sunday school material and school curricula.
Publication of brochures and manuscripts containing religious information; bible study; camp; support of mission and evangelization work
Radio program book/resource distribution conference ministry
Christian radio broadcasts
Missionary training -bible studies
Teaching training and book publishing.
Advancement of the christian faith by the publication of bible teaching resources and evangelistic tools online and in print media
Religious television broadcasting
NCEM Inc missionaries present God's Word through personal visits public services radio and television broadcasting literature production and distribution audio and video media production/distribution and children's camps.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Faith Mission (in Canada) and the most unlike its peers is Camp Li Lo Li Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NIAGRA SHORTHILLS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CAMP LI-LO-LI CANADA ↗
- Who funds ETHNOS CANADA ↗
- Who funds EVERYDAY PUBLICATIONS INC. ↗
- Who funds FBH INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MSC CANADA ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON HEATH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds SCOTTLEA ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE INTERNATIONAL RELIEF ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE - ST. CATHARINES AND THOROLD ↗
- Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE FAITH MISSION IN CANADA ↗
- Who funds OPERATION MOBILIZATION CANADA ↗
- Who funds LIVING WATERS COMMUNITY CHURCH ↗
- Who funds THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Scottlea Gospel Chapel · Heidelberg Bible Fellowship · Msc Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.