Thornloe, ON · Charitable organization
Thornloe Crossroads Baptist Church
Weekly churh ministries support of missionaries
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ethnos | C$9,800 |
| FEB Central | C$7,800 |
| Slavic Gospel Association | C$5,135 |
| The Cross Current Ministries | C$4,000 |
| Camp Joli B | C$3,900 |
| Faith Mission of Canada | C$3,600 |
| KFM Radio Northern Ontario | C$2,000 |
| Engineering Ministries International | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SGSlavic Gospel Association8× · 2017–2024 · C$71k · revenue +60%
- EETHNOS8× · 2017–2024 · C$64k · revenue +21%
- FMFAITH MISSION OF CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$53k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- FOFellowship of Evangelical Baptist Churches in Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$11k
- FOFellowship of Evangelical Baptist Churches of Canadaone grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +11%
- EFElim Fellowship Canadaone grant, 2018 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
Promote the word of god and to aid in spreading the gospel of jesus christ to the end of the earth. we challenge and assist people to minister to the unreached. we participate in conferences at churches bible colleges and universities for…
Christian radio broadcasts
Missionary training -bible studies
We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…
Transforming lives through god's word through bible translation bible publishing and bible engagement programs throughout canada and the world.
Provide academic training for the ministry of the gospel
We exist to promote the growth of the gospel of Jesus Christ throughout the world. We shall work to implement this purpose by helping the Church to recover the centrality of the Bible by training pastors future pastors and church planters…
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
Training for christian ministry through undergraduate and graduate training.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Faith Mission (in Canada) and the most unlike its peers is Camp Joli-B Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Slavic Gospel Association ↗
- Who funds ETHNOS ↗
- Who funds FAITH MISSION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds FEB Central ↗
- Who funds Camp Joli B ↗
- Who funds The Cross Current Ministries ↗
- Who funds KFM Radio Northern Ontario ↗
- Who funds Fellowship of Evangelical Baptist Churches of Canada ↗
- Who funds FOCUS ON THE FAMILY ↗
- Who funds Engineering Ministries International ↗
- Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Toronto Baptist Seminary ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian National Christian Foundation · Link Charity Canada Inc · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.