Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Thessalon, ON · Charitable organization

Thessalon Pastoral Charge

Sunday worship service sunday school bible study various womens groups

C$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$624k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL - MISSION AND SERVICEC$4,000
Individual grant recipientC$500
Individual grant recipientC$500
CAMP MCDOUGALL INC.C$60
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION POPPY FUNDC$55
Individual grant recipientC$27
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$80k · 6 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

C$80k
C$450

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CENTRAL - MISSION AND SERVICE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$70k · revenue +22%
  • NS
    North Shore Health Network Auxiliary
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$850 · revenue +29%
  • RC
    ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION POPPY FUND
    2× · 2020–2024 · C$105 · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • LO
    LIONS OF CANADA FUND
    one grant, 2023 · C$400 · revenue 0%
  • CC
    Canadian Cancer Society
    one grant, 2017 · C$50 · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Lights Regional Health Foundation

Raise funds in support of Alberta Health Services.

—
2
Port Dover Lions Club Charitable Foundation

Promoting health for canadians

—
3
Lillian Fraser Memorial Hospital Foundation

To provide support for the purchase of equipment and materials for the north shore area and lillian fraser memorial hospital.

—
4
Royal Canadian Legion Unity Branch #90 Poppy Fund

Poppy campaign to raise funds to support local cadets and the vets/widower program

—
5
Canadian Cancer Prevention Centre Foundation

Raising funds for ccs prevention centre in vancouver b.c.

—
6
Cobequid Community Health Centre Foundation

The Cobequid Foundation raises much needed funds and grants these funds to the Nova Scotia Health Authority - Central Zone for the purpose of supporting the capital equipment needs of the Cobequid Community Health Centre. This fundraising…

—
7
The Cedars Cancer Foundation at the McGill University Health Centre / La fondation du cancer des cèdres au centre universitaire de santé McGill

Purchases diagnostic equipments improve facilities for treatment and care of cancer patients continue to develop the cansupport program which offer patients and their families for psychological and humanitarian assistance support cancer…

—
8
The Northumberland Hills Hospital Auxiliary

Raise funds for the Northumberland Hills Hospital for capital equipment - Provide volunteers to support the Northumberland Hills Hospital in its day-to-day operations

—
9
Royal Canadian Legion Ont No 322 Branch Poppy Fund
—
10
Royal Canadian Legion Huntingdon (Que. No. 81) Branch Poppy Fund

Poppy campaign to aide veterans and their families

—
11
Federated Health Charities Corporation

Annual fundraising campaign which raises funds from ontario public service employees via pay campaigns and lotteries

—
12
P.E.I. Command of the Royal Canadian Legion Veterans' Memorial and Charity Fund

Donations to hospital equipment funds.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Shore Health Network Foundation / Fondation du Réseau Santé Rive Nord and the most unlike its peers is Camp Mcdougall Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRAL - MISSION AND SERVICE — C$69,734 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP MCDOUGALL INC. — C$8,863 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetNorth Shore Health Network Auxiliary — C$850 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHESSALON FOOD BANK — C$525 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLIONS OF CANADA FUND — C$400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROYAL CANADIAN LEGION POPPY FUND — C$105 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNorth Shore Health Network — C$75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Cancer Society — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligneAB2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119257269:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Thessalon Pastoral Charge’s filings →