Jerseyville, ON · Charitable organization
Theatre Ancaster
Perform musical theatre productions.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANCASTER COMMUNITY SERVICES | C$6,500 |
| HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION | C$102 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$102 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ACANCASTER COMMUNITY SERVICES4× · 2019–2024 · C$19k · revenue +53%
- HFHAMILTON FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS3× · 2019–2022 · C$750 · revenue +176%
- HHHAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · C$175 · revenue +200%
Funded once
- ASANCASTER SOCIETY OF THE PERFORMING ARTS CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$175 · revenue +749%
- ASALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF ONTARIOone grant, 2022 · C$100 · revenue -23%
- SVSHALOM VILLAGE CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$100 · revenue +257%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANCASTER COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds ANCASTER SOCIETY OF THE PERFORMING ARTS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF ONTARIO ↗
- Who funds SHALOM VILLAGE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hamilton Community Foundation · BenefAction Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.