Ottawa, ON · Private foundation
The William Shenkman Foundation
Promotion of the advancement of education in all fields and promotion of better health in all people.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRUYERE FOUNDATION INC | C$250,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BFBRUYERE FOUNDATION INC.6× · 2017–2024 · C$900k · revenue -29%
- OFOSEG FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · C$50k · revenue -8%
- TOTHE OTTAWA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2020 · C$13k · revenue +140%
Funded once
- ANARTS NETWORK OTTAWAone grant, 2019 · C$52k · revenue -21%
- DHDUNHAM HOUSEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$10k · revenue +338%
- NCNational Capital Skin Disease Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue +227%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To raise funds for the royal ottawa health care group the institute for mental health research and their clients
The ottawa hospital research institute is an independent health research facility closely affiliated with the ottawa hospital and the university of ottawa committed to excellence in the creation of scientific knowledge that contributes to…
Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
Onf is a funding agency to support research projects relating to neurotrauma injuries.
Support the university of ottawa heart foundation
To provide assistance to the art gallery of ontario
The foundation's purpose is to support evidence-informed integrative and preventative cancer care research and education. their approach emphasizes quality of life active prevention of the disease and care of the spirit.
Canadian Opera Foundation acquires holds and applies funds to assist in the development of the Canadian Opera Company and any successor organization as determined by the Board of Directors.
Support of academic medical research education and health care in canada
William Osler Health System Foundation (Osler Foundation) provides funding to William Osler Health System (Osler) a leading hospital system serving more than 1.3 million people in Brampton North Etobicoke Caledon and surrounding…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ottawa Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Capital Skin-Disease Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRUYERE FOUNDATION INC. ↗
- Who funds ARTS NETWORK OTTAWA ↗
- Who funds OSEG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE OTTAWA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUNHAM HOUSE ↗
- Who funds National Capital Skin Disease Foundation ↗
- Who funds PATRONS OF THE ARTS FOR THE VATICAN MUSEUMS INC. ↗
- Who funds Camp B'nai B'rith of Ottawa Inc ↗
- Who funds Hillel Lodge ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Trinity Development Foundation · Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'Ottawa · Wcpd Foundation · The Shabinsky Family Foundation · Taggart Parkes Foundation · Danbe Foundation Inc. · Conam Charitable Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.