Skip to content

Charlottetown, PE · Charitable organization

The Upper Room Hospitality Ministry Inc.

Food bank and soup kitchen

C$144k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$42k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$16k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$128k
C$35,025
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SOUTHERN KINGS AND QUEENS FOOD BANK INC.C$41,592
THE SALVATION ARMY SUMMERSIDE CORPSC$39,846
KENSINGTON AND AREA FOOD BANKC$35,025
SOURIS FOOD BANKC$11,944
THE SALVATION ARMY CHARLOTTETOWN COMMUNITY CHURCHC$9,484
WEST PRINCE CARING CUPBOARD INC.C$6,078
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$852k · 5 repeat orgsC$96k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +220% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

C$852k
C$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+220%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SOUTHERN KINGS AND QUEENS FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$334k · revenue +220% · 39% of their budget
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY SUMMERSIDE CORPS
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$236k · revenue ×26 · 64% of their budget
  • SF
    SOURIS FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$115k · revenue +60% · 50% of their budget

Funded once

  • SS
    SOUTH SHORE FOOD SHARE
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k
  • RF
    RUSTICO FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k
  • HC
    HOLLAND COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Weymouth Area Food Bank

Provides food for people in need

—
2
Shelburne Loyalist Food Bank

Local food bank

—
3
Northumberland County Foodbanks

Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities

—
4
Canning Area Food Bank

Provide food to families in need

—
5
Kindersley & District Food Bank Inc.

To provide food to those in need

—
6
Arthur Food Bank

To provide a 3 day emergency food supply to clients within the arthur community

—
7
Rossland Food Bank

Dispensing food

—
8
Cobden and District Food Bank
—
9
Pictou County Food Bank

Provide emergency food to those in need located in pictou county nova scotia

—
10
West Nipissing Food Bank

Food purchase for anyone in need

—
11
Stittsville Food Bank

Food bank

—
12
South Porcupine Food Bank Inc

Foodbank operation only.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Prince Caring Cupboard Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Prince Edward Island. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SOUTHERN KINGS AND QUEENS FOOD BANK INC — C$334,333 over 7y, 39% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY SUMMERSIDE CORPS — C$235,830 over 7y, 64% of budgetSOURIS FOOD BANK — C$115,085 over 7y, 50% of budgetWEST PRINCE CARING CUPBOARD INC — C$112,055 over 6y, 17% of budgetKENSINGTON AND AREA FOOD BANK — C$55,025 over 2y, 46% of budgetHOLLAND COLLEGE — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE 2007 INC — C$15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SOUTHERN KINGS AND QUEENS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY SUMMERSIDE CORPS ↗
  • Who funds SOURIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WEST PRINCE CARING CUPBOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds KENSINGTON AND AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HOLLAND COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE 2007 INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Prince Edward IslandPE9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Prince Edward Island · Food Banks Canada/Banques Alimentaires Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 108102906:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Upper Room Hospitality Ministry’s filings →