Prince Albert, SK · Charitable organization
The Synod of the Diocese of Saskatchewan
Mission is to: - teach and preach the gospel of jesus christ - adminsister the sacraments of the church activietes: - maintenance of the mission of the church by providing faithful priests and missionaries - development of programs to assist in carrying out the mission of the church and making available the sacraments
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$1k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA | C$82,500 |
| OKEMA SOCIETY FOR CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- GSGood Shepherd Anglican United Church4× · 2017–2020 · C$20k · revenue +10%
- OSOkema Society for Christian Development8× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +10%
- SMSt. Matthews Anglican Church4× · 2017–2020 · C$4k · revenue +537%
Funded once
- TCThe Corporation of the Anglican Parish of Quispamisone grant, 2017 · C$775 · revenue -37%
- TAThe Anglican Foundation of Canadagraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue +85%
- RGRose Garden Hospice Associationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$282 · revenue +495%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Anglican church parish
As a church worship christian education and pastoral care of our members equipping them to serve in the wider community.
Weekly worship services ministries to men women & children pastoral care social outreach
Worship services pastoral care weddings funerals community dinners choir christian education community outreach
Provide weekly in-person worship services bible studies prayer meetings pastoral care social outreach programs community missions offering anglican based faith teachings.
We hold-worship services weddings baptisms and funerals as required
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Fort Pitt Parish. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Anglican United Church ↗
- Who funds Cathedral Church of St. Alban the Martyr ↗
- Who funds Okema Society for Christian Development ↗
- Who funds St. Matthews Anglican Church ↗
- Who funds Fort Pitt Mission ↗
- Who funds Anglican Parish of St. David ↗
- Who funds The Corporation of the Anglican Parish of Quispamis ↗
- Who funds The Anglican Foundation of Canada ↗
- Who funds Rose Garden Hospice Association ↗
- Who funds Archidiocese of Diocese of Keewatin ↗
- Who funds Canadian Mental Health Association, Prince Albert Branch ↗
- Who funds Primate's World Relief and Development Fund ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.